Leading Schools in Lockdown

Ever since my mum first sewed that 50m swimming badge onto my trunks at age 9, I have been a martyr for a medal – little wonder then that I would make education, and the celebration of achievement, my life, now having led three 11-18 Catholic comprehensive secondary schools over the past 16 years. And loving it.

Though I doubt that 9-year-old me could have ever dreamt that his – ostensibly – grown-up version would, on New Year’s Day in 2021, be found downloading not 1 but 6 certificates, proudly recognising him as a certified Covid tester.

Well of course not because that was not a language my 9-year-old self knew, and for me language – specifically the way language has been put to use throughout this pandemic – offers a lens through which I at least can reflect on my role as a school leader – running a school at a time akin to the old fairground attraction where you had to negotiate a range of obstacles while the ground beneath your feet was constantly moving.

As we passed 100,000 deaths the other week, and Downing Street Briefings continue to try and tell our story in bar charts, it is always the personal experience that cuts home – people we have known and loved –   husbands, wives, grandparents, best friends, – yes and young people, too, on occasion.

What we do know is that the more vulnerable feel the impact greatest. Little wonder that the Archbishops of York and Canterbury recently reminded us that the impact is asymmetric – its rips into the homes of the poor, and disproportionately into the homes of ethnic minority families. Both, communities our Catholic schools have long and proudly served.

Where we are now is messy

Every day we are confronted with new challenges – and it is here, in the raw, with the smell of the suffering sheep, that we are called to go beyond the hubris of national announcements and help parents make sense of it. Many can cope – they have resilience.  But for the parents, or parent, trying to juggle, perhaps, two jobs – or none – while educating their children with a pay-as-you-go phone, the parent doing their best for a child with additional needs, or in the family blighted by domestic violence and constant fear, they are running on empty This is a national struggle, certainly, but it is felt, raw and visceral, at the local level. Seeing my staff make welfare calls to families, day in and day out, leaves me proud – with an aftertaste of existential grief.

Never in my lifetime have I seen more clearly the impact of languages being deployed, blended, and, it must be said, sometimes warped out of shape. the politicians, wishing to model the narrative around ‘we are delivering for you’, the scientists, every cautiously managing the empirical, and the Fourth Estate – the Press -wanting to draw conclusions, create [sometimes too easy] binaries and attribute responsibility from fragments which barely allow this. As Kennedy said of Churchill, we were mobilizing the English language and sending it into battle. Supported by weekly clapping, the tooting of car horns and, I am sure, the intercessions of the much-loved Captain Sir Tom, God rest his soul.

To conclude, schools are at the sharp end of social cohesion – or the lack thereof. It may not be sufficient for families in crisis to feel that, in their child’s school, they have a place, and they are known and not judged unfairly – but it seems to me it is certainly necessary. And in the perennial quest for what is distinctive in our Catholic schools, seeing in this promotion of social cohesion a core – not add on – feature of what makes the school good – let alone outstanding – should never be forgotten. In our quest to hit the State’s metric of success and receive plaudits as ‘Outstanding’ schools, we must be mindful of the need sometimes to subvert these very metrics and replace them with those that come from our belief in Christ walking our corridors. As ‘Alpha’ Heads, we are engaged in an Omega mission.

Mark Twain said ‘Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see.’  This for me has been the diamond in the rough so far in my Covid 19 journey.

Cor ad cor loquitur -a report into support and collaboration between maintained English Catholic schools and the role of the Catholic Higher Education Institution: distinctiveness, impact and challenge

From 2018-19 I undertook empirical research into school to school collaboration in the Catholic sector in England. This demonstrates a high degree of trust between schools, a real openness to working with Higher education and the importance of dialogue in securing bespoke solutions

 

cor ad cor loquitor revised version of that submitted 220419

Watch your Grammar!

grammarschool

Justine Greening, our still relatively new Secretary of State for Education, is a competent and approachable politician with a track record of working in a collegiate and constructive manner. She will need to be in her task not only of challenging but, crucially, of reinvigorating teachers – in particular, traditionally moderate school leaders- who feel battered by the increased politicisation of their once noble profession and concerned about their ability to guarantee excellence for students in the face of real cuts to education spending on the one hand and, on the other,  a perception of policy novelty on the hoof. But on one of the staples of the educational narrative – Grammar school expansion –  Ms Greening has already expressed an open mindedness which will delight some and worry others.

Grammar schools can be powerful promoters of ‘hard working’ but less well off families whose children work hard and receive the leg up that saw the grammar school ‘cadre’ increasingly taking their place in public life from the 50s to the 70s. However the Grammar school as local ‘winner takes all’ produces negative externalities. We need to accept the fact of the creation over night of many thousands of children who regard themselves as failures.

Wherever one locates oneself in this debate the bigger issue appears to be the fall-out in terms of a lack of strategy around schools which has gone hand in hand with the new frontier (Wild West?) of choice and diversity. Clearly the dismantling of Local Authority involvement is a significant issue, predicated on an apparent need to ‘free up’ schools and ‘remove red tape’ and dispel ‘low ambitions for children’. However dubious the empirical veracity of these various bogeymen, the return to a totally state managed school system is unlikely and by no means obviously desirable. However , the marketisation of free at the point of need education, whether through sponsor academies or grammar school expansion,  can create injustices in children’s opportunities and outcomes in a ‘market’ that ‘clears’, as the economist would say, about as well as the rail industry – in other words not well at all.

Less hubris, more kindness. The children are watching.

boris

Pavel isn’t his real name but he is no less a real student at my school. Engaging, bright, full of fun and carrying the confidence and contentment of a child who is loved by his family. On Friday morning as he searched for his PE kit – mum having had a go at him for leaving it in school the night before –  he asked me a simple and sobering question: Sir, will they send me home? Still bleary eyed from my 4 am alarm clock and still reeling from the tsunami of political metaphor crashing onto the beaches of the nation’s collective consciousness – ‘Seismic Shift’,  ‘Game Changer’, ‘New Britain’- it took me a few moments to reclothe myself in the self-assured garb of the Headmaster. ‘Of course not, Pavel. No one would dare do that to you!’ He smiled, less than convinced, and continued his search.That Pavel could ask this is the product of one of two things: perhaps it is naivety resulting from his age and lack of political sophistication. After all, isn’t the UK decent, honourable, welcoming, fair and tolerant? Or perhaps his question was motivated by his awareness of the deficit of kindness and the relentless creation of bogeymen [migrants, political elites, bankers] which has, for the last few months, characterised our political debate and infused our media. [Anyone who works with children know two things to be true: they have a phenomenal sense of fairness and an intuitive sense of whether someone likesthem or not].

Bogeymen are, of course, traditionally designed to scare children and we will do well during the coming weeks of uncertainty to remember the potential fall-out, the unintended consequences of this referendum and what led to it. As our history has taught us the quickest way to dehumanise the other is to ‘other’ them – to emphasise their difference. To dis-entitle them.

It is surely incumbent on all people of good faith – whatever their politics – to ensure we drive out any xenophobia from our democratic decision. But let us particularly remember the young – those who trust us to act in good faith.

After a bruising period of often aggressive electioneering and a deeply divisive result, let us hope at least that we don’t allow a deficit of kindness to ossify our debate and lead to a sclerotic and toxic culture. The world is watching. Our children are watching. Pavel is watching.