Although the Star Tribune and the Pioneer Press both cover news for the Twin Cities in Minnesota, the papers have different policies when it comes to newspaper endorsements in presidential elections. Particularly in a race that is as close as this one is purported to be, it is understandable that a newspaper would choose not to endorse either candidate, for fear of alienation of its readership.\u00a0 In an article he wrote regarding the phenomenon of endorsements, David Brauer quotes the editor of the Pioneer Press, Mike Burbach, as stating, \u201cWe just wanted to do it this way, this year. At this moment, it\u2019s more comfortable for me.\u201d Although the paper still publishes editorials regarding the election, as well as interviews with the candidates, Burbach states, upon receiving little feedback from the paper\u2019s readership: \u201cI guess that tells me people are going to make up their own minds, whether you do endorsements or not, and they have ever-more sources of information.\u201d<\/p>\n
While the Pioneer Press has not endorsed a candidate in this presidential election nor the previous, the Star Tribune has followed a different pattern.\u00a0 The paper, with nearly 100,000 more readers than the Pioneer Press, has endorsed Obama for the second election in a row.\u00a0 The Editorial Board made the endorsement despite \u201cdisappointment over the lost opportunities of his first four years.\u201d\u00a0 The Board cites concerns about Romney\u2019s tendency to adapt his image depending on the circumstance, as they write, \u201cBut who can be certain which Romney will appear next? How can any American be sure where he stands on gay rights, immigration, climate change, reproductive rights and investment in education?\u201d While it may seem like a risky move for the Star Tribune to endorse a candidate for presidency when its rival newspaper has elected not to dole out an endorsement, this is hardly the case.\u00a0 As the state with the longest voting streak in the nation, in this case, for Democratic presidential candidates, it is treated as a given among Minnesota citizens that it is and always will be a blue state. When a friend of mine turned eighteen years old shortly before the 2008 presidential election, her dad said to her, \u201cAs a conservative living in Minnesota, get used to just throwing your vote away.\u201d \u00a0Surely this is an extreme view of inefficacy, however the voting record of Minnesota speaks for itself. \u00a0While it is interesting that one paper chose to give an endorsement while the other did not, an endorsement of Obama is hardly surprising. An endorsement of Romney in Minnesota? That would be an article worth reading.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The following are links to the Minnpost article regarding the Pioneer Press\u2019s non-endorsement, as well as the endorsement of Obama by the Star Tribune:<\/p>\n
http:\/\/www.minnpost.com\/braublog\/2012\/10\/why-st-paul-pioneer-press-dropped-political-endorsements<\/a><\/p>\n