![\"\"](\"http:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/files\/2012\/06\/s5-printing.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nSPEAKERS:<\/h5>\nRichard Oosterhoff<\/h2>\n(2012-2013 NDIAS Graduate Fellow, History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame)<\/h5>\nPrinting Dissent in Lyons<\/h1>\nThe Case of Symphorien Champier<\/h6>\n
(2012-2013 NDIAS Graduate Fellow, History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame)<\/h5>\nPrinting Dissent in Lyons<\/h1>\nThe Case of Symphorien Champier<\/h6>\n
The Case of Symphorien Champier<\/h6>\n
Print shops were at first conservative institutions: printing practices were profoundly about imitation, and printers catered to existing markets. Early authors who wanted to dissent from the establishment, therefore, often sought print platforms outside of cultural capitals such as Paris. This talk will consider the case of the fiery Neoplatonic physician Symphorien Champier (1471-1538), who set up practice in Lyons as a base for philosophical and print piracy.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
Emily Ransom<\/h2>\n(Department of English, University of Notre Dame)<\/h5>\nThe Polemical Press<\/h1>\nThomas More, Brixius, and Early\u00a0Print Rivalry<\/h6>\n
The Polemical Press<\/h1>\nThomas More, Brixius, and Early\u00a0Print Rivalry<\/h6>\n
It was a normal season of Renaissance polemic: in\u00a0August of 1512, British and French ships burned in a\u00a0mutually fatal naval\u00a0battle; in November of 1512, the young French court poet Brixius wrote a heroic\u00a0poem\u00a0to commemorate the French general; in early 1513, the young British\u00a0statesman Thomas More wrote a\u00a0handful of epigrams to mock the faux epic; and by\u00a01514, the French and English were at peace again.\u00a0The\u00a0story would end\u00a0here if it were not for the Basel printing press of Johann Froben, which\u00a0inadvertently\u00a0rekindled the old scuffle into a raging literary war six years\u00a0after the French and English ships burned at sea.\u00a0In the rapidly\u00a0escalating international battle of wits that ensued, the press intensified and\u00a0hastened disputes\u00a0over great distances.\u00a0Printed text implied a (somewhat false) sense of authorial authority\u00a0while ironically\u00a0diminishing the author\u2019s control over his own words.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
Maggie Nerio<\/h2>\n(Department of English, University of Notre Dame)<\/h5>\nReformist Autobiography<\/h1>\nHarriet Martineau\u2019s Character Studies of the \u201cSerious\u201d and \u201cEarnest\u201d<\/h6>\n
Reformist Autobiography<\/h1>\nHarriet Martineau\u2019s Character Studies of the \u201cSerious\u201d and \u201cEarnest\u201d<\/h6>\n
Begun in 1855 and published posthumously in 1877, Harriet Martineau\u2019s Autobiography <\/em>is one of the crowning achievements of Victorian autobiography and one of the most remarkable texts in the history of women\u2019s literature in the Anglo-American tradition. A hybrid text, the Autobiography <\/em>functions chiefly as a bildungsroman <\/em>tracing Martineau\u2019s development in stages from fervent Christian believer, to skeptic, and finally to confirmed rationalist committed to the post-theist logic of the French social reformer and proto-sociologist Auguste Comte. This talk will examine Martineau\u2019s literary legacy and critical reception, arguing that Martineau has been unfairly maligned as a mediocre prose stylist and conventional champion of Victorian middle class convictions. Turning attention in a series of close readings to Comte\u2019s theoretical influence on Martineau and then to the Autobiography<\/em> itself, the talk will highlight the literary merits of the inclusive public discourse developed in the pages of Martineau\u2019s sweeping memoir. As one powerful reminder of the ethical social discourse advanced over the course of Martineau\u2019s prolific writing life, the Autobiography<\/em> showcases the extent to which one \u201clittle deaf woman from Norwich\u201d powerfully shaped the character of early-nineteenth-century Anglo-American print journalism, effectively promoting and modeling a pioneering form of transnational public deliberation.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Cold War was a period of great hegemonic struggle. The so-called Iron Curtain divided people into two warring camps, an eastern one and a western one. Yet, communication between the East and the West was never completely severed. Despite multiple difficulties, ordinary Eastern Europeans were able to continue their civic relations with people in the West. How was this possible? I find that East-West transnational communication was maintained throughout the Cold War with the help of an idealist invention of the late 19th<\/sup>\u00a0Century, the constructed international language Esperanto. A diverse movement grew around the language to promote international peace and understanding. The Esperanto movement attracted members primarily among Eastern European non-ruling professional and cultural elites, including doctors, lawyers, teachers, writers, etc. The movement developed a multi-level organizational infrastructure including local clubs, national and international organizations, and a well-organized public and private correspondence system. Under the umbrella of Esperanto, ideas of peace, human rights, environmentalism, and cultural exchange, as well as various religious practices could spread throughout Eastern Europe. Because of transnational contacts, the models of modernity Eastern Europeans developed included not only elements of the Marxist tradition and a local ethics of universal civil-ness as fellowship but also global cultural models, particularly the social, economic, and cultural right norms.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Monday,\u00a0December 3, 2012 5:00 p.m. Room 107 O\u2019Shaughnessy Hall SPEAKERS: Richard Oosterhoff (2012-2013 NDIAS Graduate Fellow, History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame) Printing Dissent in Lyons The Case of Symphorien Champier Print shops were at first conservative institutions: printing practices were profoundly about imitation, and printers catered to existing markets. Early […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":790,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-65","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/65","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/790"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65"}],"version-history":[{"count":31,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/65\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":392,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/65\/revisions\/392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/newmedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nAna Velitchkova<\/h2>\n
(Department of Sociology, University of Notre Dame)<\/h5>\n
Transnational Communication through the Iron Curtain and\u00a0Modernity in State-Socialist Eastern Europe<\/h1>\n