{"id":101,"date":"2016-04-18T09:00:55","date_gmt":"2016-04-18T13:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.nd.edu\/rbsc\/?p=101"},"modified":"2016-05-27T12:10:19","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T16:10:19","slug":"our-pico-is-it-human","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/our-pico-is-it-human\/","title":{"rendered":"ND’s Conservation Lab Looks at our Pico: Is it human?"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Sue Donovan, Rare Books Conservator<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The conservation lab, a unit within Hesburgh Libraries\u00a0Preservation<\/a>, has been part of a collaborative effort to determine\u00a0if a book owned by the University since 1916 was bound in human skin. The book, a volume of\u00a0the works of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola<\/a>, a 15th-century humanist writer, contains\u00a0newspaper clippings and handwritten affidavits attesting to the book\u2019s past. These documents purport that the book was\u00a0owned\u00a0by Christopher Columbus and was\u00a0bound in the skin of a Moorish\u00a0chieftain, which had been obtained after the conversion of the Muslim population of Granada to Catholicism by\u00a0the zealous Cardinal Cisneros in 1500. After contradictions were\u00a0found in the provenance\u00a0records, the conservation lab engaged in identifying the nature of the skin used for the binding.<\/p>\n

\"BOO_000943748-000a999d-illust1\"<\/a>
Opera Joannis Pici Mirandule Comitis Concordie<\/em>, by Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Argentinus: diligenter impressit industrius Ioannes Pr\u00fcs Ciuis Argentinus Anno salutis 1503 Die vero XV Marcij i.e., 15 March 1504).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In January of 2015 two samples were taken\u2014one from the purported human skin binding\u00a0and one as\u00a0a control from a book with a similar binding and of\u00a0the same time period and country of\u00a0production as the Pico volume. Finding an area that was relatively untouched was\u00a0important so that there would be no contamination from proteins and grime from centuries of\u00a0handling and consultation. Accordingly, small samples were taken from underneath the paper\u00a0pastedowns of each book, and they were sent to the New York City Office of the Chief Medical\u00a0Examiner (OCME), where they were\u00a0analyzed through protein mass spectrometry. Proteins\u00a0are more stable than DNA, and because of the unique patterns and mutations that exist across\u00a0species, they can be used to determine whether a binding has been made with pig, sheep,\u00a0calfskin, or human skin.<\/p>\n

In the meantime, Conservator Liz Dube and I took the volume to the photo macroscopy\u00a0lab on campus to see if we could determine any information about the origin of the skin\u00a0through the pore and follicle patterns, but we left just as perplexed\u2014perhaps even more so!\u2014than when we arrived.<\/p>\n

Based upon in-house tests, it was uncertain whether the Pico book was\u00a0bound in human skin. We turned next to our outside collaborators for their expertise. To find out what they uncovered, read John Nagy’s article, “The Truth Uncovered<\/a>,” in the Spring 2016 issue of\u00a0Notre Dame Magazine.<\/em><\/p>\n

Thanks to George Rugg for his research on the provenance of the Pico volume, Donald Siegle of the NYC OCME for his correspondence regarding protein mass\u00a0spectrometry, and John Nagy for his research into the personalities behind this book’s ownership and for bringing the information together in his article.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

\"Creative<\/a> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License<\/a>.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Sue Donovan, Rare Books Conservator The conservation lab, a unit within Hesburgh Libraries\u00a0Preservation, has been part of a collaborative effort to determine\u00a0if a book owned by the University since 1916 was bound in human skin. The book, a volume of\u00a0the works of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, a 15th-century humanist writer, contains\u00a0newspaper clippings and handwritten … Continue reading ND’s Conservation Lab Looks at our Pico: Is it human?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1936,"featured_media":887,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[75751,75060,12646],"tags":[77938,156],"class_list":["post-101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-conservation","category-medieval-renaissance","category-miscellaneous","tag-book","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1936"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1008,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101\/revisions\/1008"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/887"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/rbsc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}