{"id":205,"date":"2021-08-21T19:00:10","date_gmt":"2021-08-21T23:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/?page_id=205"},"modified":"2021-08-21T19:00:10","modified_gmt":"2021-08-21T23:00:10","slug":"the-democratic-party-is-radicalizing","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/the-democratic-party-is-radicalizing\/","title":{"rendered":"The Democratic Party is Radicalizing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Extremism isn\u2019t just affecting the GOP.\u00a0<em>The Atlantic<\/em>\u00a0APRIL 3, 2019<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/author\/peter-wehner\/\">Peter Wehner<\/a>\u00a0Contributing writer at\u00a0<em>The Atlantic<\/em>\u00a0and senior fellow at EPPC<\/p>\n<p>The transformation of the GOP into the party of Patrick J. Buchanan and Donald J. Trump\u2014defined by cultural resentments, crude populism, and ethnic nationalism\u2014is among\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2019\/02\/i-left-gop-because-trump\/581965\/\">the most important political stories<\/a>\u00a0of this century. But the GOP is hardly the only party that is undergoing some alarming tectonic shifts. Liberals wondering why conservatives who worry about Trump don\u2019t join the Democrats should consider what is happening on their own side of the aisle.<\/p>\n<p>If you want to understand just how radicalized the Democratic Party has become in recent years, look at the ascent of Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont. A self-proclaimed\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politifact.com\/truth-o-meter\/article\/2015\/aug\/26\/bernie-sanders-socialist-or-democratic-socialist\/\">socialist<\/a>, Sanders served as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, and was then elected to the House in 1990 and the Senate in 2006. It\u2019s hard to overstate just how left-wing Sanders\u2019s views have been, at least by the standards of American politics.<\/p>\n<p>Sanders has been a consistent\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/news-and-politics\/2019\/02\/bernie-sanders-maduro-castro-latin-america-socialism.html\">defender<\/a>\u00a0of regimes led by anti-American dictators like Daniel Ortega and Fidel Castro. He took pains to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2015\/07\/14-things-bernie-sanders-has-said-about-socialism-120265\">separate<\/a>\u00a0his brand of socialism from the \u201ctotalitarianism\u201d of the Soviet Union, but on a 1988 trip, repeatedly\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/vintage-bernie-footage-shows-now-presidential-candidate-praising-breadlines-communist-nations\">drew contrasts<\/a>\u00a0between the Soviet system and the United States that cast his own country in an unfavorable light. In the 1970s, Sanders\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2019\/03\/14\/politics\/kfile-bernie-nationalization\/index.html\">called for<\/a>\u00a0the nationalization of entire industries and 100 percent taxation on those making more than $1 million. Since then, Sanders has moved away from calling for government to own the means of production, but he has hardly experienced a Damascus-road conversion. He is still a proud leftist.https:\/\/1835d3955630c3e6c25eeeab475ab987.safeframe.googlesyndication.com\/safeframe\/1-0-37\/html\/container.html<\/p>\n<p>For most of his career, Sanders\u2014who identified as an independent but who caucused with Democrats\u2014was treated like a curiosity and even a bit of a crazy uncle by Democrats, who considered the label\u00a0<em>socialist<\/em>\u00a0to be a smear.<\/p>\n<p>No more.<\/p>\n<p>The most prominent socialist in America, Sanders has gained a following, and in 2016, he challenged Hillary Clinton for the presidential nomination. He eventually lost, of course, but not before\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/11\/23\/us\/politics\/bernie-sanders-president-2020.html\">winning roughly 13 million votes<\/a>\u00a0and 23 primaries and caucuses against Hillary Clinton, who got 17 million votes and won 34 contests. He electrified Democratic audiences in ways she could not, drawing a crowd of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/post-politics\/wp\/2015\/08\/10\/bernie-sanders-draws-28000-people-in-portland-his-campaign-says\/\">nearly 30,000<\/a>\u00a0in Portland. The hashtag \u201cFeel the Bern\u201d\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/time.com\/4213999\/bernie-sanders-feel-the-bern-hashtag-origin\/\">exploded in popularity<\/a>\u00a0in 2016. Sanders particularly inspired the younger generation,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2016\/06\/20\/more-young-people-voted-for-bernie-sanders-than-trump-and-clinton-combined-by-a-lot\/\">drawing<\/a>\u00a0far more votes in the primaries from those under the age of 30 than did Clinton and Trump combined.<\/p>\n<p>The 77-year-old Sanders is now a front-runner for the 2020 Democratic nomination, with\u00a0<em>The New York Times<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/2019\/2\/19\/18200479\/bernie-sanders-running-president-2020\">declaring<\/a>\u00a0that his leftist ideas on health care, taxes, the environment, and other matters are defining the race.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThose ideas that we talked about here in Iowa four years ago that seemed so radical at the time, remember that?\u201d Sanders\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/03\/09\/us\/politics\/bernie-sanders-2020-election-democrats.html\">said<\/a>\u00a0during a return trip to the state earlier this month. \u201cShock of all shocks, those very same ideas are now supported not only by Democratic candidates for president but by Democratic candidates all across the board, from school board on up.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn 2016 Iowa helped begin the political revolution,\u201d he continued. \u201cNow as we move to 2020 our job is to complete that revolution.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/archive\/2018\/12\/democratic-party-moves-left\/573946\/\">Read: Will the left go too far?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>He\u2019s not kidding, and he\u2019s not alone. Among the freshman class of House Democrats, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez\u2014now the second-most-famous democratic socialist in America\u2014is the unquestioned star among the base. According to Dan Balz of\u00a0<em>The<\/em>\u00a0<em>Washington Post<\/em>, Ocasio-Cortez is \u201cthe titular leader of a progressive grass-roots movement pushing the party to the left.\u201d (The mere mention of her name elicits spontaneous applause on programs like\u00a0<em>The Late Show With Stephen Colbert<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>Another prominent member of the freshman class of House Democrats, Ilhan Omar, recently dismissed former President Barack Obama\u2014who not that long ago defined the progressive wing of the Democratic Party\u2014as too right-wing. \u201cWe don\u2019t want anybody to get away with murder because they are polished,\u201d she\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/week-controversy-rep-ilhan-omar-criticism-president-obama\/story?id=61564148\">said<\/a>, \u201cwe want to recognize the actual policies that are behind the pretty face and the smile.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>To more fully grasp the leftward lurch of the Democratic Party, it\u2019s useful to run through some of the ideas that are now being seriously talked about and embraced by leading members of the party\u2014ideas that together would be fiscally ruinous, invest massive and unwarranted trust in central planners, and weaken America\u2019s security.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>The Green New Deal, a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/assets.documentcloud.org\/documents\/5729033\/Green-New-Deal-FINAL.pdf#page=8\">10-year effort<\/a>to eliminate fossil fuels \u201cas much as is technologically feasible\u201d that would completely transform the American economy, put the federal government in partial or complete control over large sectors, and retrofit every building in America. It would change the way we travel and eat, switch the entire electrical grid to renewable energy sources, and for good measure \u201cguarantee\u201d high-paying jobs, affordable housing, and universal health care. It would be astronomically costly and constitute by far the greatest centralization of power in American history.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Medicare for all, which would greatly expand the federal role in health care. Some versions would wipe out the health-insurance industry and do away with employer-sponsored health plans that now cover\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/content\/dam\/Census\/library\/publications\/2018\/demo\/p60-264.pdf\">roughly 175 million<\/a> This would be hugely disruptive and unpopular (70 percent of Americans are\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ahip.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/AHIP_LGP_ValueOfESIResearch_Print_2.5.18.pdf\">happy<\/a>with their coverage), and would exacerbate the worst efficiencies of an already highly inefficient program.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Make college\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/2019\/3\/7\/18252270\/progressives-tuition-debt-free-college-schatz-pocan\">tuition-free and debt-free<\/a>, with the no-debt promise including both tuition and living expenses\u2014a highly expensive undertaking ($50 billion a year or so just for the federal government)\u2014that would\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/research\/who-would-benefit-most-from-free-college\/\">transfer money<\/a>from less wealthy families whose children do not attend college to wealthier families whose children do. It could also have potentially\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lohud.com\/story\/news\/politics\/politics-on-the-hudson\/2017\/01\/13\/cuomo-tuition-plan-private\/96560364\/\">devastating<\/a>\u00a0effects on many private, not-for-profit colleges.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Increase the top marginal tax rate to 70 percent from its current rate of 37 percent for those making more than $10 million,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/blog\/high-tax-rates-wont-work-todays-economy\">unwise<\/a>in the 21st-century economy and far above the average top rate for OECD nations; and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/01\/24\/us\/politics\/wealth-tax-democrats.html\">impose<\/a>\u00a0a \u201cwealth tax\u201d that would levy a 2 percent annual tax on a household\u2019s assets\u2014including stocks, real estate, and retirement funds\u2014above $50 million. It isn\u2019t even clear whether a tax on wealth rather than income would be constitutional, but that almost seems beside the point.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2018\/07\/02\/politics\/abolish-ice-democrats-list\/index.html\">Abolish<\/a>the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which upholds immigration laws; protect \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/2018\/3\/8\/17091984\/sanctuary-cities-city-state-illegal-immigration-sessions\">sanctuary cities<\/a>\u201d (local jurisdictions that don\u2019t fully cooperate with federal efforts to find and deport unauthorized immigrants); and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/beto-orourke-says-hed-absolutely-take-down-the-existing-border-wall-in-el-paso\">take down<\/a>\u00a0existing walls on the southern border, walls which Speaker Nancy Pelosi has\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/pelosi-calls-trumps-wall-plan-an-immorality-2019-01-02\">referred<\/a>\u00a0to as \u201can immorality.\u201d These policies signal that Democrats don\u2019t really believe in border security and are mostly untroubled by illegal immigration.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/jay-inslee-2020-election-end-senate-filibuster-0c957d36-5a36-46ae-9374-e4e46b2b9aef.html\">Eliminate<\/a>the Senate filibuster,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2019\/03\/18\/2020-democrats-supreme-court-1223625\">pack the courts<\/a>, and put an end to the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/donald-trump\/some-dems-want-end-electoral-college-trump-says-it-s-n985256\">Electoral College<\/a>. The effect of these would be to weaken protections against abuses of majority power.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/2019\/3\/11\/18246741\/reparations-democrats-2020-inequality-warren-harris-castro\">Reparations<\/a>for African Americans to provide compensation for\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2019\/03\/01\/698916063\/2020-democrats-wrestle-with-a-big-question-what-are-reparations\">past injustices<\/a>\u00a0like slavery, Jim Crow laws, and redlining. (Senator Elizabeth Warren believes Native Americans should be included as well.) Reparations would pose countless practical problems and create unintended consequences, as David Frum\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/business\/archive\/2014\/06\/the-impossibility-of-reparations\/372041\/\">argued<\/a>\u00a0in these pages.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Opposition to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2019\/02\/new-york-and-virginia-push-expand-abortion-rights\/581959\/%5d\">any limits<\/a>on even third-trimester abortions, and opposition to the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/democrats-block-senate-bill-requiring-medical-care-for-babies-that-survive-abortion\">Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act<\/a>, legislation clarifying that babies who survive attempted abortions must receive medical care. Abortion is a very difficult issue that requires empathy on all sides\u2014but for many of us, this stance of Democrats is morally incomprehensible.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Increasing\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/02\/08\/opinion\/sunday\/israel-progressive-anti-semitism.html\">antipathy<\/a>aimed at Israel, one of the most estimable nations in the world. Two freshmen Democrats, Representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, have\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/forward.com\/fast-forward\/418351\/bds-ilhan-omar-aipac\/\">embraced<\/a>\u00a0the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement targeting Israel, and House Democratic leaders faced a fierce\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/03\/06\/us\/politics\/anti-semitism-resolution.html\">backlash<\/a>\u00a0in their efforts to condemn the anti-Semitic remarks by Omar, who has a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/03\/07\/opinion\/ilhan-omar-anti-semitism.html\">record<\/a>\u00a0of anti-Semitic comments and who most recently\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2019\/03\/ilhan-omars-dual-loyalty-charge-was-anti-semitic\/584314\/\">accused<\/a>\u00a0supporters of Israel of dual loyalties. (The Democratic House, unable to pass a measure that focused solely on anti-Semitism, eventually passed a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/03\/07\/us\/politics\/ilhan-omar-anti-semitism-vote.html\">resolution<\/a>\u00a0condemning \u201chateful expressions of intolerance.\u201d)<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>To be sure, these views are not embraced by all Democrats\u2014but they are ideas that are gaining adherents, including among several presidential candidates, and are fundamentally reshaping and radicalizing the Democratic Party. On every front, the Democratic Party is moving left, and the power of the left can be seen in the fact that even Democrats who oppose some of these policies are wary of attacking them. When it comes to challenging the progressive wing, Democratic candidates act as if they are walking on eggshells. (There will be no Bill Clinton\u2013style\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/politicaldictionary.com\/words\/sister-souljah-moment\/\">Sister Souljah moment<\/a>\u00a0in the Democratic Party in 2020.)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2018\/11\/democratic-voters-move-leftward-range-issues\/574834\/\">Read: How far have the Democrats moved to the left?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>If former Vice President Joe Biden enters the race, he will likely spend a fair amount of time apologizing for positions he embraced, like his tough-on-crime stance, his\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/03\/29\/us\/politics\/biden-abortion-rights.html\">view<\/a>\u00a0that the Supreme Court went \u201ctoo far\u201d on abortion rights, and how he handled the Anita Hill accusations against Clarence Thomas when he was chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Biden has already\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/videos\/politics\/2019\/03\/17\/joe-biden-slip-running-president-nr-saenz-vpx.cnn\">said<\/a>, \u201cI\u2019m told I get criticized by the new left. I have the most progressive record of anybody running for the\u2014anybody who would run. Of anybody who would run.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This embrace of radical progressivism and its colossal price tag is almost certainly going to hurt Democrats politically\u2014most of their\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/the-suburbs-all-kinds-of-suburbs-delivered-the-house-to-democrats\/\">gains<\/a>\u00a0in 2018 were in suburban districts, among voters who tend to recoil at radicalism of any kind\u2014and it could be politically disastrous. (Ocasio-Cortez enthusiastically embraced the label\u00a0<em>radical<\/em>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/ocasio-cortez-suggests-individual-tax-rates-as-high-as-70-2019-01-04\">saying<\/a>, \u201cIt only has ever been radicals that have changed this country.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p>But beyond the electoral ramifications of the radicalization of the Democratic Party is what conservatives like myself consider to be its destructive animating philosophy. The trend is toward growing hostility to free markets and capitalism, in many cases to the point of barely contained contempt for it and for the wealthy. (When former Governor John Hickenlooper, a successful businessman and one of the more moderate candidates in the Democratic field, was asked by MSNBC\u2019s Joe Scarborough if he would say he\u2019s a capitalist, he repeatedly\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=rYmsH4Tg8Fg%5d.\">ducked<\/a>\u00a0the question. Beto O\u2019Rourke, while declaring himself a capitalist,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2019\/03\/15\/beto-orourke-capitalist-economy-racist-1223475\">added<\/a>, \u201cHaving said that, it is clearly an imperfect, unfair, unjust, and racist capitalist economy.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p>Many progressives champion the centralization of government power and collectivism, extreme egalitarianism, and a secularism that can bleed into\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/opinion\/articles\/2017-09-11\/feinstein-s-anti-catholic-questions-are-an-outrage\">intolerance<\/a>\u00a0toward people and institutions who hold traditional religious views on sexual morality.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2017\/10\/symmetric-polarization\/544059\/\">Read: Trump is radicalizing the Democratic party<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Democratic Party is embracing a form of identity politics in which gender, race, and ethnicity become definitional, and a belief in a common culture, unifying ideals, and the need for assimilation is weakened or shattered. (\u201cI acknowledge the truth of the criticism that I have enjoyed white privilege,\u201d O\u2019Rourke\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2019\/03\/15\/politics\/beto-orourke-wife-white-privilege\/index.html\">recently said<\/a>.) The Democratic Party is more and more unable to stand up to anti-Semitism. And it\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/the-left-was-about-salvation-the-right-is-about-the-end-times\/2019\/03\/18\/2cd16898-49b8-11e9-9663-00ac73f49662_story.html\">seeks<\/a>\u00a0\u201cthe elevation of human autonomy above other humane values,\u201d as Michael Gerson has argued. The roots of this ideology are not in the labor movement so much as in the postmodern academy. The mood of many progressive Democrats these days is uncompromising and unforgiving.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats want to focus their attention on the flaws and corruptions of Donald Trump, and they have a lot to work with. But you won\u2019t become a saint through other people\u2019s sins, Anton Chekhov said, and the Democratic Party will not become a responsible governing party because of the faults of President Trump.<\/p>\n<p>Progressivism is wrecking the Democratic Party even as crude populism and ethnic nationalism have (for now) wrecked the Republican Party. Both are salvageable and both are worth saving, but that will require individuals who have identified with each party to fight to reclaim them; to show wisdom, decency, and courage in an age of extremism and intemperance.<\/p>\n<p>We want to hear what you think about this article.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/contact\/letters\/\">Submit a letter<\/a>\u00a0to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/author\/peter-wehner\/\">PETER WEHNER<\/a>\u00a0is a contributing writer at\u00a0<em>The Atlantic\u00a0<\/em>and a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He writes widely on political, cultural, religious, and national-security issues, and he is the author of\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.harpercollins.com\/9780062820792\/the-death-of-politics\/\">The Death of Politics<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.harpercollins.com\/9780062820792\/the-death-of-politics\/\">: How to Heal Our Frayed Republic After Trump<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Extremism isn\u2019t just affecting the GOP.\u00a0The Atlantic\u00a0APRIL 3, 2019 Peter Wehner\u00a0Contributing writer at\u00a0The Atlantic\u00a0and senior fellow at EPPC The transformation of the GOP into the party of Patrick J. Buchanan and Donald J. Trump\u2014defined by cultural resentments, crude populism, and ethnic nationalism\u2014is among\u00a0the most important political stories\u00a0of this century. But the GOP is hardly the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/the-democratic-party-is-radicalizing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Democratic Party is Radicalizing&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":114,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-205","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/114"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":206,"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/205\/revisions\/206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.nd.edu\/world-politics-2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}