Miranda and the art of sitcom writing

In class, we talked about our feelings about multicam and single cam sitcoms. I, like it seemed most of us, have grown accustomed to single camera comedies. That’s not to say I don’t appreciate the multicam sitcoms, but I just feel like they are becoming a thing of the past. Most contemporary sitcoms shot in multicam are on CBS like the “Big Bang Theory” and “Two and a Half Men” which are generally popular amongst the older demographics of 35+. The younger audiences, like us, seem to favor things on NBC like “The Office”, “Parks and Rec”, and “Community” which are all single camera. When we watched “Miranda” I was immediately reminded of the sitcoms I used to watch growing up as a kid and a teenager, but I was disinterested because it was no the style of shows that I presently watch. My favorite sitcoms are the shows which are shot in the single camera format, where I see the multicams as the old way of doing things. I grew up watching “Friends”, “Seinfeld” and “Everybody Loves Raymond”, but my tastes seem to have evolved with the modern sitcom to favor the single cam.

One of the thing I did notice about “Miranda” was the writing. Writing a sitcom is incredibly difficult because I thought they are essentially going from one punch line to another. We talked about the subtle humor that we saw in “Twenty Twelve” with the snarky, under the breath comments or quick phrase right before a cut that you can easily miss. But a sitcom requires intricate phrasing and timing in order to get the audience to laugh at all the right places and find the show funny. At first I was critical about the episode of “Miranda” we watched because it felt like it had a few very big jokes and the rest of the show as just filler. So I looked up an article from The Guardian which commented on “How to Write Comedy: Writing Sitcom”(http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/sep/22/comedy5) and it gave me a much greater insight into the art of sitcom writing. It stated that “Sitcoms are not about ‘gags’. It’s bad sitcoms that are full of jokes.” and they finish up by saying “character and situation make it hilarious.” By this explanation I can appreciate what “Miranda” was trying to do with its comedy. It wasn’t just trying to be a laugh factory by producing joke after joke.

The character of Miranda herself was pretty entertaining in herself, but the humor that was happening wasn’t always laugh out loud funny. There was something almost charming about the way she acted. Although I personally still prefer the single camera, I still have a great appreciate for the multi camera sitcom. They both require a special, specific style of writing which fits the format they are writing in. I feel like “Miranda” is a great example of a multicam sitcom which emphasizes the character and situations to make it funny, rather than just fire off joke after joke.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Miranda and the art of sitcom writing

  1. Robert says:

    I agree that multi-cams definitely are plagued by repetitive and cliche jokes. I think what is interesting is whether that is a limitation of the structure, or whether, because they are generally targeting older audiences, it is intentionally done so that the shows can reach the widest audience possible. Someone had mentioned in class how there will always need to be the classic family sitcom, and it seems that at least for now it is the multi-cam that is bounded to this structure. I wonder for how long this will be the pattern, and whether there will ever be a transition back to the multi-cam system for the production of edgy sitcoms.

  2. Kelly Taylor says:

    I like that you brought up the writing of Miranda as being more than just a “joke factory.” For a multicam sitcom, the jokes were less cliche than I expected them to be, which I think can be attributed to the unique persona of Miranda herself. She definitely carries the sitcom and gives a new twist to the typical repetitive jokes found in multicam shows. The program would come across as more edgy if it were converted to a single camera, but I don’t think the multicam style is particularly limiting to Miranda.

  3. Carleen says:

    I don’t think I would go so far as to say I was disinterested personally. Even though it seems a little outdates for our generation, there are many multi-camera sitcoms that still bring the laughs – regardless of if the are the typical “joke factories” you talk about. With the setting and style they are going for with Miranda, I do think that it works, and I really enjoyed the show. Yes, I could see where some stereotypical jokes were going to come, but they’re stereotypes for a reason. They get laughs from the audience – myself included.

Comments are closed.