A different breed of bootcamp

ND stadium

Notre Dame’s football stadium

A post from our student blogger Roberto

The week before classes start at Notre Dame, students in the Master of Science in Patent Law program attend a week long orientation fondly known as “bootcamp”.  This week serves as an intensely focused time of reprograming your brain from your undergraduate mode of thinking to a new perspective that is necessary for success in the program.

I, for one, am extraordinarily thankful for bootcamp.  While my engineering background has many positives benefits that I am sure will serve me well in the future, the type of thinking required in this program is quite different from anything I have had before.  Bootcamp allowed me to slow down and digest this new way of attacking problems and prepare myself for the many challenges and opportunities that will come my way in the next year.

One of the many highlights from bootcamp was that we as students got to take a mock Patent Bar exam.  While I had never seen anything like it before, I am sure glad I got to sit down and have that experience before I ever set foot in one of my classes.  This gave me the chance to see first-hand what type of knowledge would be required of me upon graduation.

We also did plenty of fun activities during bootcamp including campus tours and a South Bend Silverhawks baseball game.  As a group we have diverse backgrounds and come from all walks of life.  We have PhD students, international students, as well as chemistry and biology majors just to name a few.

As you can see, it is not necessary to have an engineering background to study patent law; what is required is a natural curiosity that will drive you to understand how an invention works.

This picture was the first thing I saw when I set foot on campus for the first time as an actual Notre Dame student.

Even though it’s not bright and sunny out I love this picture.  To me, it signals the difficult times ahead and warns that the road will not be easy.  However, at the end of that journey lies the ultimate prize.  I am excited and ready to begin my first week in the MSPL and look forward to every step of that journey.

 

Hello from Catie

A post from our student blogger Catie Stevens

Hello, my name is Catie Stevens, and I am a student in the Patent Law Master’s program at the University of Notre Dame for the 2014-2015 school year. I am a native of Indianapolis, IN and a recent graduate of Ball State University in Muncie, IN where I earned my Bachelors of Science in Biology with a concentration in Genetics. Patent Law stood out as a viable option for me because it is a specialized career path that suits my interests. In the field of Biology, it can be difficult to find a job after college without having experience or a higher degree. In my undergraduate career, it was nearly impossible to even find an internship, because most companies do not want you there unless you already have a degree. Notre Dame’s program prepares its students to be Patent Law Agents in one year. Patent Law piques my interests because I enjoy writing and I love biology, so I can use both of my passions in this career to help others understand science while helping scientists receive patents for their ideas.

I have also chosen to pursue a Master’s in Patent Law in hopes of connecting to the field of genetics in a unique way. In addition to my biology coursework, I also took psychology courses and volunteered at a local domestic violence shelter and crisis center. Therefore, I have more of an orientation for working with people and conveying ideas to them as opposed to performing laboratory work. I would like to work as a Patent Law agent mainly to work alongside of other geneticists and lab researchers in the genetics field who are making strides in the detection and prevention of genetically inherited diseases and in cancer genetics. I also hope to pursue a Master’s in genetic counseling after receiving my degree in Patent Law. As a Patent Law Agent, I would have the option to work independently or with a law firm. I liked that I would have the flexibility of working independently as a Patent Law Agent while also working a very different job. Overall, I am incredibly excited to be part of the Patent Law program and I hope that it leads me to play a vital role in making positive changes in medicine!

 

Hello from Megan

A post from our student blogger Megan Usovsky

I can remember the exact moment when I discovered what I wanted to do when I grew up…It was a stifling afternoon in late May during a high school anatomy class.  Without air conditioning the atmosphere was thick as syrup in the mid-afternoon Missouri humidity.  The anatomy lab was no exception:  it began to reek of preservation fluid in early spring just as students began to dissect fetal pigs.  Most students, and even some faculty, regarded the second floor science wing as an abysmal pit that needed to be avoided altogether starting in March.  The strong scent of this occurrence never bothered me, though, and in fact, I felt at home in this section of the building because it was where half of my favorite classes were located.  The other half of my favorite classes were held in the English department wing.  It may have been the heat, but during this stuffy 6th period anatomy class I was struck with revelation:  someday I would combine my love for science with my love for writing.

I pursued both science and writing after high school and I went on to receive my B.S. in Biological Sciences at the University of Missouri.  Following undergrad, I received my Juris Doctor from the Thomas M. Cooley Law School.  During law school I was privileged to be selected to serve on two scholarly writing publications:  the Thomas M. Cooley Law Review and the Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practical and Clinical Law.  Following law school, I co-authored two legal articles on workers’ compensation and negotiation.  Currently, I have been a practicing attorney for over three years and have had the great fortune of learning some incredibly valuable legal skills.  The ability to persuade judges and opposing counsel with words, especially in writing, can mean the difference between a client’s favorable or detrimental outcome.

I have reached a point in my professional career that I am truly ready to merge my scientific interests with my love of writing and my legal abilities—this is what attracted me to Notre Dame’s MSPL program.  The 10 month curriculum trains matriculated candidates with science and engineering backgrounds to become patent agents or patent attorneys.  A patent agent is a person who has met specific technical and educational criteria, has passed the USPTO Exam, and is licensed to draft and prosecute patent applications.  A patent attorney must have the same qualifications as an agent, and additionally, is a licensed attorney who may conduct patent trials and practice in trademark cases.  Both patent agents and attorneys work closely with persons and entities seeking protection of innovative ideas.

Patent law clients are very special:  they are inventors.  The ability to communicate with technological innovators cannot be learned from mere passage of the patent bar, though.  Practical experience is crucial to translating the details of an invention into a well-crafted patent application.  The Master of Science in Patent Law program at Notre Dame will prepare me to effectively and efficiently converse with inventors to understand and then draft their ideas onto paper.  The MSPL program at Notre Dame possesses incredible opportunities for prospective patent attorneys and agents, especially through hands on education.  Matriculates will draft a faculty inventor’s application and then submit it for patent, get the opportunity to work with leaders in technology and science, and sharpen technical skills through class work and patent research.

It is an honor to join Notre Dame’s esteemed Master of Science in Patent Law Program in an exciting field where science and innovation collide.  In essence, patent law is a Big Bang of technological thought process and physical construction of an idea—the point where science discovery and law crash together to create a formidable result:  a patent protecting an invention.  Each member of Notre Dame’s MSPL program approaches the curriculum with unique education and work backgrounds, I am thrilled to share my practical legal perspective with the program and look forward to gaining a greater depth of knowledge from the other MSPL candidates, professors, and innovation professionals we will be privileged to work with.

Hello from Roberto

A post from our student blogger Roberto Fernandez

Roberto blog 1Welcome to the 2014-2015 Masters of Science in Patent Law (MSPL) student blog!  My name is Roberto Fernandez and I am a member of the class of 2014-2015.  I will use this blog throughout the year to catalogue my journey at Notre Dame and within the MSPL curriculum.

Before we begin, I think it would be helpful for you to know a little about me and how I got here.  I am the oldest of five, with one brother and three little sisters, and I am from the small town of Mukwonago in south-eastern Wisconsin where I have lived my entire life.  I am blessed to have two incredible parents.  My mother who worked as a nurse for many years, eventually managing the trauma team of the emergency room of Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin and now is actively involved in alternative education advocacy, and my dad who is currently in his 23rd year as a career firefighter on the City of Waukesha Fire Department.

As a child, my parents made the incredible decision to take on the responsibility of educating me themselves.  I was homeschooled until 5th grade, when my parents learned about a new virtual public school which had just opened in Wisconsin under the Charter School Act.  This new school, known at the time as the Wisconsin Virtual Academy (WIVA), was one of the first schools of its kind in the world.  At WIVA, students participated in a new blended learning style which combined a typical classroom with the internet and virtual technology.  While I may not have gone to a traditional brick and mortar school like many of my friends, I ended up receiving the education that was best suited for me.

When I got to 8th grade I knew I wanted to attend a brick and mortar high school.  I wanted to play sports with my friends as well as prepare myself for a traditional college environment.  My parents and I chose Catholic Memorial high school where I would go on to play baseball, football, be a member of the school’s Science Bowl team, as well as an award winning actor in the state of Wisconsin.

Now that you know a little bit about my childhood background I want to shed some light on my career motivations and inspirations.  While my unique upbringing is largely responsible for my character and personality, one particular set of events forever shaped the career path I would take.  While lifting wet and heavy hose after a large fire my dad severely injured his back and, as a result, was relegated to bed rest and physical therapy for a few months.  While he recovered, my dad secretly developed an invention that could have prevented the injury he and many other firefighters had sustained while performing daily tasks with fire hose.  He labored relentlessly for the next few years tweaking the design and molding it into a work of art.  Eventually, my parents scraped together enough money to contract out a blacksmith in town to weld together a rough prototype of my father’s design.  After constructing a working prototype my parents decided to take a huge risk by starting a family business.  Our company, RollNRack LLC. Inc, has come to offer firefighters around the world tools that have revolutionized the way daily tasks are performed.  Throughout the process my parents explained to me what was going on and gave me a first-hand entrepreneurship experience that has continuously proved invaluable in my professional life.  As a young child I was able to see the way a dream could be transformed into a reality as we went from a small start-up to an industry leader.  During the summers since, I have traveled the country selling our products to customers from all over the world at countless conventions, conferences and tradeshows.  It is through these amazing opportunities that I first realized some of my true interests and passions in life.

 

After graduating from high school I went on to attend the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE) pursuing a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering (B.S.M.E.) with a minor in mathematics.  While you may not have heard of MSOE, its Mechanical Engineering program is ranked 11th in the Midwest, according the U.S. World and News Report, and it prepared me extraordinarily well for a career in industry.  After an amazing internship my junior year I discovered that I would not be happy working in industry like many of my peers.  I yearned for the opportunity to do something revolutionary. I knew wanted to make a difference in the lives of as many people as possible and I just could not see myself doing that in a traditional engineering setting.  This is when I knew that I needed to continue my education beyond MSOE.

At first, I looked at graduate programs in Mechanical and Aerospace engineering.  I was really interested in the research going on in these fields and felt like they would be a great fit.  I applied to schools all over the country looking for the right program.  One of the programs I applied to was the Mechanical Engineering graduate program at the University of Notre Dame.  Shortly after applying I received an e-mail letter advertising the MSPL program.  After opening the e-mail I thought back to my experiences with my father and how my parents were told they would need to patent my father’s designs before we manufactured them.  At the time I remember thinking that the job sounded very interesting but that I was more interested in building the products being patented rather than actually constructing the patents.  I could not help but wonder, however, if this was the next step for me.  As I looked over the program I was impressed and intrigued with what it had to offer.  I loved that it was a one-year program and that it was one of the first of its kind.  Ever since I was a child I have enjoyed challenging the status quo and this program certainly seemed to offer an avenue for me to continue that mission.  I felt like if I wanted to receive an education in Patent Law there was nowhere that I would rather go.  Soon after I read the e-mail I had to leave for class but I continued to think about this new and exciting opportunity throughout the day.  The next morning I had decided that I would apply for the program and see how things played out.  Before long, I found myself accepting a spot as a member of the 2014 MSPL class at the University of Notre Dame.  That decision was one of the easiest decisions I have made in my entire life.  From the moment I applied to the program everyone I spoke with at Notre Dame was amazing; answering every question I had and making me feel like I was already part of the community.  The morning that I accepted my spot in the program I knew this was the way things were meant to be; though, a year ago I would not have guessed that this is the path I would find myself on.  This experience has shown me first hand that sometimes we cannot possibly predict the path that life will take us on.

During the first weeks of this summer I was able to make my way down to campus for a visit.  My brother and I woke up at 4 in the morning and drove down from Wisconsin stopping only for the unfamiliar tolls along the way.  Despite a constant downpour we drove throughout the entire campus and ran through campus buildings like teenage girls tearing through stores on Black Friday.  After walking into each new building I was more amazed than when I had left the last; I was in utter shock that this immaculate and awe inspiring place would soon be my new home.  I could not believe it when I first saw the courtroom in the Eck Hall of Law, seemingly hidden within one of the most beautiful and miraculous buildings at Notre Dame.  As an incoming student it is exciting to imagine working on homework on the luscious grass of the quad during the week and enjoying football games at the second most beautiful stadium in the country (with the first being Lambeau Field, the home of the Packers, of course) on the weekends.  After visiting campus I knew that Notre Dame was my new home.

Well I hope that this introductory blog post sheds some light on who I am and allows you to understand my unique perspective as a student and as a professional.  I will use this blog regularly to showcase my MSPL experience as well as my other adventures around Notre Dame.  It is my ahope that this blog will give others a firsthand look at the program and answer any questions that they may have.  If there is something that I have not addressed in my blog that you are curious about or if you have any other questions please send an email to rfernan3@nd.edu and I will do all that I can to help you find an answer.  Thank you for your time and welcome to the 2014-2015 student blog!

 

MS in Patent Law Still Accepting Applications

Notre Dame’s one-year MS in Patent Law is accepting applications for the 2014-2015 academic year.

Our students learn hands-on skills that prepare them for a career as a patent agent – helping people prepare and obtain patents. Patent agents work at the cutting edge of their technical area, and also at the cutting edge of the law.

Applicants must have a background in science or engineering. Strong applicants have good oral and written communication skills. Applicants with EE and advanced degrees are especially encouraged to apply.

We expect our class to fill soon. Apply early for best consideration!

MSPL Student on 1st Place ND Team in 2014 Cardinal Challenge

By Nina Welding

NanDio, a team of students from the University of Notre Dame, took first place in the 2014 Brown-Forman Cardinal Challenge held February 14-15 by the University of Louisville College of Business. The team was honored for its business plan to commercialize an oral cancer detection device for dentists. All teams were judged on their written plan, the poise and professionalism of their presentation, and the viability of their venture. The NanDio device’s simplicity of use, speed of test results and accuracy of the test as an early detector gave the team the winning edge.

Mimicking the real-world process of developing and growing new commercial ventures, including raising venture capital, students in the Cardinal Challenge developed business plans based on their own ideas and technologies or on those developed by others. The NanDio team — graduate students Ben Miller, an MBA student in the Mendoza College of Business; Patrick Rice, a student in the Engineering, Science & Technology Entrepreneurship Excellence Masters program; Marcy Kreimier, who is pursuing her master’s in patent law at Notre Dame; and Daniel Miller, an M.D./Ph.D.  pre-doctoral fellow at the University of Missouri School of Medicine — along with faculty adviser Gaylene Anderson, senior commercialization officer at the Cleveland Clinic focused their efforts on biomarkers and a novel membrane sensor technology recently. The biomarkers were developed at the Mike and Josie Harper Cancer Research Institute by Miller and M. Sharon Stack, the Ann F. Dunne and Elizabeth Riley Director of the Mike and Josie Harper Cancer Research Institute and professor of chemistry and biochemistry at Notre Dame, while the membrane sensor was developed by Zdenek Slouka, a postdoctoral associate in the Center for Microfluidics and Medical Diagnostics (CMMD); Satyajyoti Senapati, a research professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Hsueh-Chia Chang, the Bayer Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and director of the CMMD. Chang and Senapati are members of the Advanced Diagnostics and Therapeutics Initiative at Notre Dame. The research was supported by a Walther Cancer Foundation grant to Professors Chang and Stack.

Each challenge team was also required to field a minimum of two but no more than five members, prepare an executive summary and present a 15-minute pitch describing the nature of the technology and potential of their proposal. This was followed by a 15-minute question-and-answer session during which the judges — more than 25 successful venture capitalists, entrepreneurs and business leaders — quizzed team members about their presentation. Twelve of the 13 invited teams braved the wintery weather to compete.

As the winner, NanDio received $15,000; an invitation to the 2014 Global Venture Lab Investment Competition, which will be held May 1-3 in Austin, Texas; and a more than $125,000 “Launch in Louisville” package, which requires the winning team to locate and operate its business in Louisville within one year of receiving the award as well as an advertising package, $25,000 design and technical architecture services, logo development, a $10,000 cash economic incentive, website development, office space for a year, and more.

Other participants included Local Libations from the University of Texas at Austin (second place), A-76 Corrosion Inhibitors from Rice University (third place), Movellus Circuits from the University of Michigan (fourth place), Appro Therapeutics from the University of Louisville, CYANO Pharmaceutical from the University of Oregon, the University of Arkansas’ Datavis, Don’t Be Skiddish from the University of Manitoba, the University of Cincinnati’s Effuelent, FluidScreen from Yale University, Huntin’ Buddy from Kennesaw State University and NuFortis from the  University of Illinois at Chicago.

# # #

Marching with Mutts

On Saturday, the PATL students had the opportunity to help out Pet Refuge again (see post from Bootcamp week) at the annual Mutt March at St. Pat’s Park in South Bend.

There were many cute doggies – some in costume, some doing agility training, some sniffing other dogs. One of the best things was seeing the dogs who had been adopted from Pet Refuge with their fur-ever owners.

Some of us helped the doggie marchers and their humans find their way on the trails (if you haven’t been to this beautiful park – go now!). We also helped out at the vendor tables selling all things pet-related.

Elaine and David ready to hit the trails

AUTM Days 2 and 3

On Wednesday I attended a very interesting session: “Not the Usual Suspects: Non-traditional IP from Non-traditional Sources.” The panel presenters from the OTT from the University of Illinois shared how they realized one day that they were only interacting with a very small part of their campus. To kick start communication with the rest of the campus, they held an open meeting with the deans of the humanities and social science departments to discuss what the OTT does and what types of resources they could offer.

They have since partnered with foreign language department, industrial design, music, sociology, psychology and architecture. The OTT has made the commitment to the entire campus to listen and learn, and to adapt existing processes and tools (within reason) in order to meet non-traditional IP needs.

One presenter from a consulting company mentioned something important to think about when opening up OTT resources to departments other than STEM – impact is not always proportional to dollars. These projects are still important.

The consultant also talked about licensing opportunities for university collections of art, music, artifacts, antique maps, and books. These licensing agreements are often very different from tech agreements in that they are limited term, payout minimum royalties in advance and often specify how the work is to be used (replicated on t-shirts, used as a logo for software, etc.). This type of licensing protects the university’s investment in the collection.

Today on the closing day of the conference, I attended a session which was essentially an open discussion about faculty expectations of tech transfer offices. Many topics were brought up in this session both from faculty representatives and OTT representatives such as faculty motivation for disclosing their IP (money, altruism), the need for consistent clear expectations and communication from both parties, and showing the value of what the OTT can bring to the inventor.

One university representative talked about having a faculty liaison act as a bridge between OTT and the inventor. When OTT has to say no to a technology or invention, the inventor might doubt that the OTT office has done its due diligence, but if a colleague explains why it can’t move forward, they are often more accepting of the news.

One panel presenter who has been on both the university and the corporate side of IP, suggested that the OTT be more involved with the brainstorming around how ideas and technology could be used. He gave the example of a chemist who is very interested in how certain molecules are bonding, but is unsure of how this would be applicable commercially. The OTT staff could bring an outside perspective on ways the technology could be used.

Another suggestion from the audience is using a third-party patentability and licensing analyst. This negates any perception of the tech transfer office being biased toward individual faculty or departments.

 

 

 

Tech Transfer and Patents: Observations at AUTM

My name is Cathi Kennedy and I am the program coordinator for the MSc in Patent Law. This week I’m attending the Association of University Technology Managers’ (AUTM) Central Regional Meeting in Indianapolis. Representatives from universities, law firms, and industry are here to exchange ideas, network, and learn about new trends and practices in the field.

Having neither a technical nor legal background, I am here to observe and absorb information and meet nice, very smart people who are interested in hearing about the MSc in Patent Law program.

Today’s first session was about the America Invents Act, which went into effect on March 16th. Two people on the panel were from the USPTO. They spoke to the new procedures and requirements surrounding the new act, and also about the AIA training and resources available for both new and seasoned patent examiners.

The other presenters were from law firms and a tech transfer office. They spoke about how the new act is changing the way patent applications are being written and prosecuted and took questions from the audience.

I also attended an interactive session on “Negotiating the Basics.” In this session, we broke out into groups in which half the took the side of the university and the other half played the role of the industry. Each side then had to go through the terms of negotiation on the technology for the Horseless Carriage from their perspective. The terms that were considered were scope, term, joint development, reps and warranties, consideration (payments), improvements, and enforcement of patent rights.

My half of the group represented the company side of the negotiation (although all the members of the group work for tech transfer departments). Panel representatives from a university tech transfer office and from a large biotech company then talked through each of the terms of negotiation from their viewpoint. It was interesting to see how each side ranked the terms’ importance and which areas were more contentious (consideration and reps and warranties for instance).

Tomorrow’s agenda: licensing opportunities from non-traditional sources, and trends and strategies for working with academia from the industry leader perspective.

2013 BIO International Convention

A post from our student blogIMG_4962_Ager Sarah Goodman

I attended the BIO International Convention April 21-25, 2013 at McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois. The University of Notre Dame is a BIO member company and a 2013 exhibitor. I volunteered for two days and received two day passes for the convention. During my volunteer sessions on Monday and Tuesday, I worked in the Sponsor Lounge where I was able to interact with members of large international biotech companies. I was able to participate in the convention on Wednesday and Thursday. It was a great opportunity to visit the exhibits and speak with professionals in the biotech and law fields.

Some of the exhibitors were representatives of law firms that practice in the field of intellectual property law. I spoke with patent attorneys and agents from many law firms including Thompson Coburn LLP, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Frommer, Lawrence & Haug LLP, Foley Hoag LLP, and McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP. The convention also featured major biotechnology companies. Participants included Astellas, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline. I really enjoyed meeting domestic and international professionals in my field.

Besides the individual exhibitors, there were separate pavilions for each country and some states of the US. Each country pavilion had details about the particular country and business information. During a reception on Tuesday, each pavilion contributed to the festivities. The Switzerland pavilion provided a chocolate fondue with fresh fruit and cookies. The Belgium pavilion provided fancy coffee served by a barista. My favorite pavilion was the France pavilion which provided cheese and wine to attendees and where French was spoken almost solely.

The BIO International Convention was a great opportunity both professionally and academically. Attendance significantly impacted the drafting of my thesis and my professional development. The BIO International Convention was an exciting event that provided a lot of valuable information and insight into intellectual property law, pharmaceutical development, and marketing strategies.