The (r)Evolution of an invention

Posted on February 4, 2015 by Catherine

A post from our student blogger Megan

The evolution of the wheel (Photo credit: geniusstuff.com)

If you have been following the MSPL blog in any depth this school year then you know that we have been working with scientists, engineers, mathematicians and other Notre Dame faculty to draft patent applications on their inventive creations. This is our thesis project. In December, we presented our findings and initial patent application claim drafts to our faculty advisors and inventors. Now we are on the path to drafting the finalized version of the patent application that covers our respective technology. This might seem simple, I mean, it is just filling out an application you say, right? No. In fact, the art of claim drafting and task of completing a patent application are a little daunting. But the end product is within sight and we are looking forward to achieving this goal.

One of the most challenging aspects of completing a patent application is how to capture the essence of an ever-changing underlying invention. Let me explain what I mean. I am fortunate enough to work with two incredibly bright, visionary biochemists and two brilliant, keenly astute engineers. The invention that these four faculty members supplied to me in August was a curious drawing of several component lab parts strung together that they said would change the face of cancer diagnostics. I diligently visited each inventor’s lab for a total of twelve times to have the essentials of this apparatus explained to me. When December rolled around, I had crafted a forty-five minute oral presentation that, I thought, tied my inventors’ ideas neatly together with the patent concepts we had been learning in the MSPL. Despite a few random butterflies, I was confident about my knowledge of the science and engineering principles, as well as the legal concepts that I needed to discuss. The words flowed like liquid gold from my mouth until I was stopped by one of the biochemists. It seemed that I had not perfectly captured the essence of this invention after all. My faculty advisors discussed with each other, and with me, what the bare bones of their concept was and I left satisfied with my performance but also with a feeling of slight uncertainty: according to my inventors, the invention that they envisioned had changed since August.

Two weeks into January I have now received more updated drawings of my inventors’ concept. These drawings are a world away from the originals that I was handed at the start of the school year. The idea is still the same, though. And although this means revamping my patent application-completion-strategy, this is the single most exciting thing that could have happened to me. You see, I’ve gotten to witness the creative genius of four talented inventors. I’ve also learned firsthand that inventive concept is not static, it is dynamic and evolving; one idea leads to an even better one. This has taught me patience and has ignited yet another deep level of fascination with the most basic understanding of how things work.

An idea that begins small will probably evolve. In patent law you have to just sit back, relax, and go with your inventors’ lab flow. Inventing is a mutable concept: one drawing leads to a plethora of new thoughts. You have to be ready, as a patent agent or attorney, to revise and rework your patent application to match what your inventor needs to patent. In the end, this tiny little lab evolution of one little idea just might be the next big revolution in science and engineering.

Classroom tested, industry ready

Posted on January 28, 2015 by Catherine

A post from our student blogger Roberto

The first few weeks of the second semester have gone by fast. These new classes are refreshing and offer a whole new take on patent law. The most dramatic difference so far has been in our capstone class where we have been paired with industry mentors who will review all of our assignments. Their feedback will be instrumental as we craft our final patent application. It is helpful having someone who you can go to with complicated questions and needed advice along the way. As many of the bloggers mentioned, writing a good set of claims is a form of art. Having an industry mentor allows you to see a completely different artistic style as well pick up helpful tips they have learned through their careers.

In our other classes we have already covered several interesting topics. Claim interpretation, figuring out how a set of claims impacts the potential infringement of an article, so far has really interested me. Claim interpretation is almost entirely an exercise in argument between the two sides over the meaning of words and the use of punctuation. Patent Litigators, individuals with a law degree, argue before each other, judges and a jury about all of these things. In the end, millions of dollars have been spent (typically) and the entire landscape of an industry may change. For example, in recent years Samsung has had to pay out around $1.2B to Apple in patent disputes over their competing technologies, according to Forbes.

Last semester we spent a good amount of time working on claims for physical devices but not much time working on what are called “method” claims. Method claims protect a certain way of doing things to achieve a specific, new and useful result. This semester we have a whole series of assignments directed to constructing these special claims. This experience will be very useful for many students since their capstone projects require the use of this type of claim. When would a method claim be useful? Well, suppose that you decided to try to use engine degreaser to ward off the pesky ants persistently attempting to infiltrate the crack under your front door. Much to your amazement the ants, and all other insects for that matter, never came near your door again. Suppose you wanted to patent this newly found miracle ant repellant. Well, you couldn’t get a patent on the actual ant repellant since it was just some engine degreaser you had lying around. What you could attempt to do however, is obtain a method patent on the new and useful method of spraying engine degreaser on areas to repel ants. Writing claims to protect methods is very different and in many senses more difficult since you are not claiming a physical article and instead a process.

In general, this semester is geared towards getting us ready for the day-to-day life of being a patent agent. We are routinely turning in assignments simulating those we will have at our jobs in a few months. As an engineer, I really appreciate having the opportunity to practice the legal writing and formatting skills many take for granted. One last piece of exciting news is that being a patent agent was just rated the #4 on CNN’s “Best Jobs in America” list. This is great news for the MSPL students and only reaffirms our excitement to join the field.

The Packers lost. I will be the first to admit that they deserved to lose. And, in the end, I am glad they did. A few days after the loss the younger brother of our head coach died of a heart attack suddenly and without warning. I am thankful that we lost because it meant that our coach had the opportunity to speak with his brother during those final days; an opportunity that he otherwise may not have had. As the great Vince Lombardi once said, “In my life there are three things: God, Family and the Green Bay Packers. In that order.”

Interview with MSPL professor, Mike Wack

Posted on January 19, 2015 by Catherine

Professor Mike Wack

A post from our student blogger Megan

After a few weeks of winter break the Notre Dame MSPL students have returned to lovely South Bend, Indiana. Strike “lovely.” If you know anything about the Great Lakes region, where Notre Dame is located, you know that January is not the most pleasant month of the year for this area. In fact, it is quite snowy…and cold…and at times…miserable. But as we return, we have started to reflect on last semester and how far we’ve come. We have had some great opportunities and have created some lasting memories with one another. One particular conversation I had with another MSPL’er was about our Patent Law and Prosecution professor last semester. Professor Mike Wack—we both agreed—would have banished our January glums with his “aloha.” Aloha means “hello” and “goodbye,” but if you’ve ever visited Hawaii you know that aloha extends far beyond greetings—it is a way of life. The dictionary defines aloha as “friendly,” “hospitable,” and “welcoming.” These are three words that can certainly be applied to the environment that Professor Wack created for his students in his patent prosecution class.

Mike Wack epitomizeed aloha by wearing one of his forty-six Hawaiian shirts each week to class. Professor Wack’s spirit of aloha went far beyond his shirts, though. Each Monday afternoon the MSPL students were greeted with Professor Wack’s laid-back, conversational approach to learning how to prosecute patents. Professor Wack is an incredibly astute engineer and patent law professional; he is detail-oriented, grades tough but fair, and has high expectations for his students. Attending his class, though, was a lot of fun. He took time to answer every question thoroughly and concisely.

When it snowed twelve inches in one day last November, Mike Wack still wore a Hawaiian shirt to class. It’s nice to know that even though there may be a blizzard outside, we have professors like Mike Wack. Mike’s aloha has inspired us to learn. He has deep roots in the Notre Dame system and is part of a truly fascinating legacy with the University. The following is a brief discussion with Professor Wack, who you will see, is a pretty cool guy with aloha spirit that is quite contagious.

Please discuss your background. You are a teacher, engineer, and a licensed, practicing patent agent—why did you choose this particular career path?

I began a career in medical device product development as soon as I got out of graduate school, and did that for twenty-one years. It was a fantastic, rewarding occupation … I was able to design and develop devices and instruments used on many individuals. During that time, I became very interested in the intellectual property side of things and I took it as a challenge to design around competitive IP. I was able to take and pass the Patent Bar Exam, and then find a position in the same industry as a patent agent. I can still work with and mentor development engineers, while at the same time protecting our intellectual property. The best of both worlds!

Please discuss your associations with the University of Notre Dame and why you decided to teach patent prosecution at this university.

I have a very long association with ND! My great-uncle, Fr. Ed Keller, was a world-famous economist who taught there. My grandfather lived where Eddy Commons is now (at one time Knute Rockne lived across the street), and taught German there. My father graduated from there in 1950, along with a brother and several uncles, cousins, nieces and nephews. Two of my brothers are Holy Cross priests and attended the seminary there. And finally, two of my children currently are undergraduates there. I grew up in South Bend, and spent a lot of time on campus. True story: I came very close to being born in the stadium during a home game. Notre Dame is in my DNA!

My son saw a flyer about the MSPL program in his e-mail, and forwarded it to me. I immediately contacted Karen Deak, and we got it worked out. It is really a dream for me to be able to teach at Notre Dame and follow in my relatives’ footsteps.

What surprises you about patent law?

I guess the biggest surprise to me is how important every single word can be in a patent application. Each word’s meaning can be argued throughout the prosecution, and then again post-issuance. It makes me be really vigilant when I handle applications!

You often times stress to your students the importance of preparing for the USPTO Examination, commonly known as the “patent bar.” Please recount your personal experience with this test.

The first time I took the Examination, I was really confident and told my wife during the lunch break how well I thought I was doing. After I finished the afternoon session, I couldn’t believe I had scored a 64 and therefore did not pass! When I called my wife on the way home, at first she didn’t believe me. Then, she hurried outside to pick up the “Congratulation!” signs from the front yard and cancel her planned celebration (she told me this later). I was initially pretty discouraged, but I studied for several weeks and then re-took and passed the Exam. By the time I was finished studying, I’m pretty sure most of my children knew what a 102 rejection was!

What is the most important piece of advice that you would give to a newly licensed patent agent or attorney?

Look outside the art field of the invention! I have found a lot of relevant art in fields that on the surface appeared to have nothing to do with what I was searching. It is also a good way to help development engineers find ideas if they are stuck.

In your opinion, what is your greatest accomplishment in your career thus far?

Strangely enough, the first two years and my last two years. The first two years I developed custom implants for people with serious bone deficiencies or deformities, and it was extremely rewarding for me to be able to help them lead pain-free and functional lives. In my last two years I hope I have been able to not only teach students patent law, but also pass on some of my “life’s lessons” and help them become better people as well.

Please discuss your personal “fashion” choices.

I am well-known for my Aloha shirts … I have 46 of them! I wear a different shirt for each class, and I hope the students enjoy my brightening their day a little. Some of them wonder what I wear to work every day, and I tell them “Aloha shirt and jeans!”

What’s next for you; will you continue to teach as well as practice at Biomet, Inc.?

I hope to continue teaching the MSPL Patent law & Prosecution class. As far as my “other” life, I hope to continue to work as a patent agent for Biomet since I love working with medical devices. I am also starting a patent searching business (Blue Jay IP, LLC) with the eventual goal of doing that full-time. Finally, my wife and I want to be involved with as many philanthropic activities as possible: God has blessed us immeasurably, and we want to help others share in our fortunes!

The second half

Posted on January 16, 2015 by Catherine

A post from our student blogger Roberto

After a few short weeks off, winter break is finally over in the MSPL. My break largely consisted of working around the house, installing countless car parts in the frigid Wisconsin weather and enjoying time with my friends and family. Of course, I spent some time studying for the patent bar but largely this break was about focusing on what really matters to me. I learned recently that we often forget to take time for the little things in life and I knew there wouldn’t be much time for them this semester. That’s because the final semester in the MSPL is jam packed with patented filled fun by featuring a follow-on class in patent law and prosecution, a specialized patent prosecution class, an ethics class, the second half of the capstone project and an elective class. Just like last semester a major theme of the coursework in the MSPL is preparation for success in the real world. In addition to coursework, students in the MSPL are diligently working through the PLI patent bar study kits provided by Notre Dame. These kits include both physical literature and access to a multitude of comprehensive video lectures by PLI professionals. The kits even include practice patent bar questions that students can work through once they feel confident in a particular area.

The second semester will also include trips for the students to both California and to Washington D.C. These trips are focused on exposing the students to different types of careers and work environments that they may be interested in pursuing after graduation. As has been mentioned in a few past posts there are many different career options that MSPL graduates can pursue. Like last semester there will be many guest lectures hosted by prominent patent professionals in which they will give us practical insight into these career options as well. These guest lectures also serve to compliment the coursework of the MSPL by delving further into specific topics than would otherwise be possible. For example, a patent practitioner from the intellectual property merchant bank Ocean Tomo will be giving a lecture on intellectual property valuation, a topic that we simply don’t have the time to expand upon within the framework of the MSPL.

As you may have heard, my Green Bay Packers, and I say mine because I am an owner, have advanced in glorious fashion to the NFC Championship game in Seattle. For those who saw the Divisional game against the Dallas Cowboys you undoubtedly noticed the controversy over the potential game turning catch by Cowboys’ wide receiver Dez Bryant with around four minutes left in the game. While it was initially ruled a catch on the field, a challenge by the Packers forced the referees to enforce a rule that nullified the play. While many agree that the call was correct according to the current rules, few agree on whether the rules are proper to begin with. This is where the analogy to patent law comes in. Many familiar with patent law dislike many of the rules and standards they are held to. However, these individuals will be held to the rules whether they like them or not. If you aren’t a sports fan I apologize for always mentioning sports in my posts. I mainly do this because want readers to know I am a normal guy with a normal life outside of the MSPL (and because I love the Packers).

GO PACK GO!

Interview with MSPL professor Ron Kaminecki

Posted on January 14, 2015 by Catherine

A post from our student blogger Catie

As the bloggers have discussed numerous times, a thorough prior art search is pivotal to drafting a worthwhile patent application. During the fall semester, patent searcher Ron Kaminecki instructed the MSPL students in a course that focused solely on patent searching. Ron is a wealth of knowledge and experience, and he uses that knowledge and his own personal connections to provide his students with the broadest possible exposure to the realm of patent databases. Ron also uses his experiences to provide real-life examples of what he teaches, which hold the attention of his students.

After graduating from the Illinois Institute of Technology with a Bachelor’s degree in Chemistry, Ron began his career as a technical assistant chemist at the IIT Research Institute in Chicago where he did chemical information work, mostly concerning contract research. One of his first big jobs was to prove that trains can spontaneously catch fire; a task in which he succeeded and gained a passion for information searching. He transitioned into performing patent searches, and decided on a whim to get a Masters in Computer Science and then later take the patent bar exam. By the suggestion of his wife, he decided to take the LSAT and was later accepted into DePaul Law School, which he attended while also working as Manager of Patent Information at a drug company. Because of the law school’s newly formed department of intellectual property, Ron was one of the first graduates to receive a Certificate in Patent Law at the same time as a JD. Ron has spent his career as an independent Patent Information Researcher, assisting clients and leading courses in patent searching in all parts of the world. I asked Ron to answer a few questions for the blog, and the following is a brief overview of the fantastic stories and experiences that he shared with me.

What do you like about patent searching?

“I would be given the name of a company or a patent number and was expected to do a full legal briefing to my boss and the rest of the team (a techie and a financial person) usually within the next day or two! Then, we would all fly onsite, armed with a blank check and would have to decide whether or not to buy the company/patent from the client. I did deep dives into the literature and would love finding “embarrassing” facts, like one company in which the president’s spouse had owned a trademark for the company. When I name dropped this, the room went silent and they asked how I knew this! Just did my homework. I did several of these and really enjoyed doing this work.”

What brought you to be an adjunct professor at the University of Notre Dame?

“I was out of a job after 32 years at one company and was consulting when an old friend told me about the new program that Karen Deak was setting up. I contacted Karen and proposed a patent analysis course. Just a few days before we met to discuss this possibility in person, I fell off my bicycle (I’m a big bicyclist) and ended up in the ER with my entire left side abraded, a crack in my pelvis and other painful injuries. I could barely walk and could not sit and didn’t think I made a good impression on Karen; she was gracious as always. She contacted me a few weeks later to say that she could not use a patent analysis course. However, during the first school year, she contacted me because she noticed the students were struggling with finding patent information for their capstones. I did a two hour quick overview with the students, along with the same goofy examples that you saw, and showed them how to search. I agreed to consult over the semester, and Karen asked me to put together a syllabus for the next year of patent law students. Since then I have done a similar class at DePaul Law last summer and have since put together another class for New Hampshire Law. Luckily, this class is all online (which, while I am typing this, I am staring at my recording apparatus as I am recording my classes now).”

What do you like most about teaching a patent law course at the University of Notre Dame?

“I really like meeting the students because I like to meet people face to face. I learn from students, too, and I do change my syllabus, my teaching methods, and my presentations based on feedback. Yes, I do notice people almost dozing off when I am going through one of my hundred slide presentations. So, I add ridiculous inventions, or I try to find a really memorable example (like the black pills made by heating a mole for a week) to make people remember that a drug can involve a product and a method patent. Or, I will introduce something colorful, like the Mars lander that I worked on. I try to teach while entertaining, never the other way around, because I have found that all this technical stuff goes in and out and no one remembers it, but show them a tea bag and how to do a patent search on it, and they tend to remember it.”

You often spoke about your experiences in China. How did that shape your career in patent law? Do you get to travel outside of the country for your job?

“At one point I traveled about 80% of my time, though that was mostly in the US. I’ve been to many countries in Asia and Europe several times per year for many years and have even been to South Africa a few times. Based on my work in Asia, I have been asked to speak at legal meetings in which people paid to hear about the latest cases. My background in law and public speaking has taken me around the world many times. I once had a million miles on American and an a million and a half on United. I also learned that you have to be able to say a few words in the native language. Nothing special, just “Thanks; yes, no; bathroom?” and such essentials.”

If you weren’t a patent searcher, what would you be?

“I would be a judge in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; the court that decides patent cases. Nothing like having everyone stand up when you walk into a room! Just kidding. I would love to dig into the depths of really technical cases and then argue with others.”

What is the greatest piece of advice that you would give to a beginning patent agent or attorney?

“Meet as many people as you can and remember them. Get to know their spouse’s name, their kid’s names, their dog’s name, their favorite food and better yet, the food they hate. People really like it when you recall such details years later. Also, I encourage everyone to get as educated as possible! I would love to further my education in a different field or learn something fun instead of something technical/legal. I learned how to cook for very large groups (hundreds) when younger, and I have an award winning chili recipe that made it into a cookbook! I’ve finally hit upon the almost right recipe…I’m always improving on my recipes!”

We are family

Posted on January 7, 2015 by Catherine

Members of the MSPL at Wine and Canvas for a fun holiday party!

A post from our student blogger Megan

The European Patent Office (EPO) defines a patent family as “a set of either patent applications or publications taken in multiple countries to protect a single invention by a common inventor(s) and then patented in more than one country. A first application is made in one country – the priority – and is then extended to other offices.” This simply means that you can apply for a patent on one invention in one country and receive patents for the same invention in many countries. You can research patent families and tracespecific publications to the original patent application document. All the patent documents are related, hence the name “family.” The Master of Science in Patent Law program is a lot like one of these patent families.

Each student in the program fulfills a certain niche. There are four doctoral degree students, two doctorates of law, and each MSPL member has an undergraduate degree in either the hard sciences or engineering. While we are all different, we also share quite a bit in common. We struggled to write claims during the first semester. We laughed at each other’s outlandish comments in class. We shared our worries and our frustrations. We became a family over the first semester of the program.

The most important thing we each shared over the last four months is perhaps our friendships. Through our common experience of going through the program together we bonded in a very unique way. Just like your real family, sometimes you get impatient with your family members and sometimes you even get a little annoyed with them. But in the end, you are family and you stick together. Sure, we’ve gotten to do fun activities together like go to a baseball game and have a painting party. But it is the day to day experience of becoming patent practitioners that has strengthened our bond and brought us together. We are fortunate to have each other and have made a point to celebrate each MSPL member’s birthday outside the classroom. We are a family—a patent family.

Argue everything

Posted on December 16, 2014 by Catherine

It’s that time of year again: finals and the holidays.

A post from our student blogger Megan

See that title? Yep. That’s my philosophy. Since I became a licensed attorney in 2011 my outlook on life in general changed. Instead of accepting what life threw at me with little complaint— even if it made me uncomfortable or angry—I decided to radically change my reaction to how I dealt with the roller coaster we call life. No more would I be a passive life participant, I decided I would argue my beliefs. Patent law has reiterated my will to go to battle for what I want to passionately pursue. While the title might seem arrogant, believe me, it is not. There is a method to my madness. Let me explain.

It’s December here at Notre Dame and while the world is suiting up in light-up reindeer sweaters and toasting with egg nog toddies, the MSPL students are preparing to present their projects to their mentors. This activity is more commonly known to graduate students round the world as “defending your thesis”. This single phrase can send shock waves of terror through any sleep-deprived grad student from Hong Kong to Bemidji. But what do we have to fear? Well, everything. On a positive note, we have been preparing for this day for the last sixteen weeks. The time has come to show off what we have learned. The time has arrived. It is time to dazzle our advisors with the evidence of how hard we have worked.

Our job is to convince our mentors that we understand the underlying technology that they have developed. We are also charged with reconciling patent laws to the technology and then explaining this concept to them. Patentability as a legal theory is far more complicated than merely filling out an application and sending it to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, though. And explaining this concept to scientists and engineers can be daunting.

One of the biggest obstacles that we have all encountered in our patent application drafting journey is the fact that there are a lot of other related patents, publications, and information already existing on the inventions that we are trying to patent. Basic patent laws dictate that if the invention already exists within the public domain, patent protection will not be granted. The question becomes, how do you deal with this? More importantly, how do you explain this to your mentors? First things first, don’t give up. It is easy to say that you have an invention that does not deserve legal protection when you find something that looks similar to what you are trying to patent. When encountering this roadblock it is, in fact, a great time to really inspect the subject matter that you are trying to patent—it has to be new. Take a step back, reexamine your position and add more evidence to see if you can form a better argument regarding novelty. Even if you can show the slightest bit of inventive newness, then you are placing yourself in a much better position to earn a patent.

Life is full of rejection, though, and the patent prosecution process is no exception. So even if you believe that your invention is patentable, and you have satisfied all the statutory requirements within the four corners of your patent application, you might still receive a rejection. Once again, don’t give up. Argue against that rejection, present evidence, or amend your claims: whatever you choose to do, stand your ground and bolster your opinion. When you base your application around well-written claims, a strong specification, and a thorough search, you can argue everything.

As can see, my “argue everything” mentality is not just for lawyers that are backed into a corner. It’s also not just applicable to patent law, and it’s certainly not a blanket statement indicating that you should fight without merit. It is a justification that shows you are confident in your preparations and understanding. It’s a daily practice because “a great explanation can make our ideas come to life, invite people to care and be motivated to learn more.”[1] So get out there and argue everything.

[1] Lefever, Lee, The Art of Explanation: Making your Ideas, Products, and Services Easier to Understand, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), preface xi.

The struggle is real

Posted on December 9, 2014 by Catherine

A post from our student blogger Catie

We’ve reached the end of the first semester; the half-way mark of our year in the MSPL program. Didn’t I just survive boot camp, maybe, two weeks ago? Time is flying and we have all learned so much in the span of four months. The half-way mark of the MSPL means that the time has come for us to give the ominous ‘Technical Presentation’ for each of our capstone projects. This is the time for each of the MSPL students to ‘flex some muscle’ and show how much we have learned over this first semester.

The technical presentation is a culmination of our understanding of the technology and science behind the invention, what we have found in our semester-long prior art search, and the accuracy and completeness of the claims that we have drafted, all to produce the final educated opinion of whether or not the invention is patentable. An entire semester’s worth of work must be crammed into a two-hour presentation, which explains why this endeavor to prove what we have learned and accomplished is so “ominous”. This two-hour presentation is formally presented to our inventors, the MSPL program director, and our advisor with the Technology Transfer Office at Notre Dame. As you could probably imagine, this little factor can be incredibly intimidating. Not only do we have to sufficiently prove that our work over the past semester is steering us in the right direction of a viable patent application, but we are demonstrating our knowledge to individuals who are experts on either the technology or patent law side of the presentation content. Therefore, it’s pivotal that we master a complete understanding of what we are talking about for both sides.

There is no sugar-coating it: all of the work that goes into this presentation is incredibly stressful. We are nascent patent agents who are suddenly thrown into the task of synthesizing, streamlining, and coherently teaching everything that there is to know about the patentability of our capstone project’s invention. Each of us has faced a road bump or two during this process and has struggled to either understand the technology of the project or to identify which patent laws may be likely to inhibit the inventor from obtaining a patent. This process is a struggle at times, but we are here in the MSPL program at Notre Dame to embrace that struggle and to learn from it.

This post may have been really discouraging to prospective students or patent agents up to this point, but I want to be clear that although this process has been difficult, I can’t think of anything that I would have wanted to change about it. Although getting up and giving such a formal presentation in front of so many professionals is daunting, I am bursting with the excitement of sharing what I have found regarding this invention and its future!

I have invested so much time and effort into my capstone project that it has basically become like my baby. I find myself getting defensive of the technology whenever I receive criticism of my presentation and findings, even when the target of the criticism is out of my hands. I often have to catch myself from saying ‘our invention’ instead of ‘the invention’, because quite frankly, I had nothing to do with the conception of the idea. Nonetheless, I take a lot of pride in the research that I’ve done regarding the comprehension and patentability of the invention, to the point where I care about it like an inventor would. Not to mention, I am working with wonderful inventors who have been nothing but patient and courteous when I’ve asked to meet with them on short notice, asked them to describe for me the same concept for the third time, and pulled them away from their research to ask a few questions. At this point, I want nothing more than to see their invention thrive as a patent, regardless of the fact that my name won’t be on it. To conclude: Yes, this process has been difficult and anxiety-inducing at times, but I am so glad to be part of this project and to be playing this role in its development and future!

I was quoted in an article in Minnesota Lawyer last month!

Posted on June 15, 2014 by Karen

… of course it was an article about a new competitor. But, anyway, I got a nod.

Home / Minnesota Legal News / Legal News / U law school launches patent masters

U law school launches patent masters

By: Elizabeth Ahlin April 4, 2014 0

The University of Minnesota Law School is launching a new degree program geared toward training patent agents and portfolio managers.

The new Master of Science in Patent Law, which will have its inaugural class this fall, is geared toward science and engineering students and working scientists and engineers. The nine-month program will prepare students both to prosecute patents and become portfolio managers.

“That’s part of what makes our program unique, that broad focus,” said law school associate dean Sharon Reich Paulsen. “When students go through our program they’ll certainly want to take the patent bar, they’ll certainly be qualified to become patent agents, but they’ll also have a much broader spectrum of knowledge as a result of the curriculum that we’re building here.”

The curriculum is designed to appeal to graduating students, mid-career professionals, and inventors who want to get a better handle on how to manage the business side of their endeavors. The Twin Cities is uniquely suited to foster such a program, Paulsen said.

“The Twin Cities is a hotbed of innovation and outside of Silicon Valley might be one of the leading centers,” said Paulsen. “Because of that the Twin Cities has attracted and developed some really high-powered patent attorneys and patent practice here.”

Plans to start small

One of those attorneys was Chris Frank, who has worked both as a patent attorney and a portfolio manager for Medtronic. With that breadth of experience, Paulsen said, Frank was a natural choice to be the program director for the new degree.

Frank has an easy answer for those who wonder why such a program is needed. He pulls out a graph which shows the number of new U.S. patent applications skyrocketing — from 300,000 to 550,000 annually — since 2000. During that same time, the number of new patent bar members has remained flat.

“With this increase in patent filings, there’s also a need for people that can have a more sophisticated approach to patent law too. It brings in the need for portfolio management, creating revenues through licensing,” Frank said. “How do we enforce these patents? How do we manage thousands of patents that we have now for our products? Not only do we need more people filing, but we need more people who can do the business side of what’s involved with owning all of these patents.”

In its inaugural year, Paulsen and Frank are hoping for a small class of about six or seven students. Initially, they are targeting undergraduate science and engineering students who are interested in patent prosecution and portfolio management.

The school plans to offer scholarships of between $15,000 and $20,000 to the members of its first class. Tuition will be comparable to law school tuition, which is currently about $40,000 for residents and $47,000 for nonresidents. Eventually, Paulsen said, they will develop a part-time program so they can more effectively market the degree to working scientists and engineers. Even further down the line, they hope to offer it as LL.M. degree in patent law to foreign students.

The fall semester curriculum will include both JD and master courses, including patent law and patent prosecution. Students will also take portfolio management, a patent-specific writing course, and will have the option of taking an elective, which could be from the law school or be a technical science or engineering elective course.

Patent agents in demand

Robin Wright, associate dean of the biological sciences, said the new program will be a boon for the science school as well. Working with patents offers science students a potentially lucrative outlet for their technical knowledge and expertise. And, because so many science students enter the University of Minnesota at the sophomore level in terms of credits, this could offer those students the opportunity to earn a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in four years in a field that is in great demand.

“We love the collaborative attitude the law school is bringing to the table,” Wright said. “We think these are the kind of win-win situations that will be real wins for our students and ultimately real wins for the law school as well, because they’re able to attract a whole new genre of students into their programs.”

The program will include a capstone course in portfolio management, which will help bring the education offered beyond just patent agent training. Students will look at technology that has been tried in the marketplace, Frank said, and examine the way it succeeded or failed.

“You can reverse engineer why, what’s working, what’s not working, and identify the opportunities,” Frank said.

A few other schools — Northwestern University, University of Notre Dame, Arizona State University — have similar degree programs. The program at the University of Notre Dame is in its second year. The first class had seven students; the second class had six. Almost all of the members of the first class were hired as patent agents at law firms, said program director Karen Deak. The job market for patent agents is strong, Deak said.

“When I’ve talked with law firms, they want more,” Deak said. “They want patent agents. You can pay them a little bit less, clients like it. From a firm economics standpoint, an agent is a little better moneymaker.”

The program at Notre Dame is different from the University of Minnesota in that it is run through the science department, not through the law school. But Deak said it offers the legal background required to be a successful patent agent.

Non-JD programs on rise

Northwestern University will launch its inaugural class of Master of Science in Law participants this fall. The program offers a concentration in intellectual property and patent design.

“Some people need really focused specific types of legal training as opposed to, say, a three-year JD,” said Kirston Fortune, assistant dean for marketing and communications at the law school. “This has given rise to a lot of masters programs, and ours is specifically tailored to people with science, engineering and medical backgrounds.”

According to the American Bar Association, which approves but does not accredit non-JD programs at ABA-approved law schools, enrollment in non-JD programs has increased from 7,291 in 2000 to 11,139 in 2013. Those numbers might not include programs like Notre Dame’s which would not need ABA approval since it is run as part of the science school, not the law school.

Paulsen said the new program is not an attempt to make money by the University of Minnesota.

“Yes, this will grow over time and will attract students and will bring tuition revenue,” Paulsen said. “Is that our sole motivation for doing this? No, absolutely not.”

Paulsen said she believes the program will add value to the law school and its students, as well as to the state of Minnesota itself. Rachel Clark Hughey, a partner in intellectual property litigation at Merchant & Gould, agreed. Hughey said she anticipates area law firms and corporations to have a strong interest in the program’s graduates, who will have a more holistic understanding of patent concerns.

“Minneapolis and St. Paul are home to a lot of sophisticated companies,” Hughey said. “There is room for a program like this in the region.”

Graduation 2014!

Posted on May 19, 2014 by Karen

We just finished up Graduation Weekend 2014. I am so happy to celebrate with all of our new graduates!

On Friday night, we hosted students and their families at an intimate dinner at a local restaurant. I got to meet parents, siblings, and other loved ones in a celebration of what our students have accomplished, and the great things which they are heading to next.

Then Saturday morning was the Graduate School ceremony. Nobody tripped, and everyone received their diploma. Saturday afternoon was the commencement Mass, and we had a beautiful homily from Fr. Jenkins. The whole-University Graduation Ceremony was on Sunday, and the weather was, against all odds, beautiful!

A couple of our students (Elaine and Marcy) made their way into the official ND graduation video. See them here, they’re at 0:40. http://bit.ly/NDGradWrapup

It’s been a great year and I wish the best for all of our students! Congratulations!!!

Rose, Joseph and Marcy