Feed on
Posts
Comments

A Primer on Critical Thinking

The following entry from the 2012-2013 Teaching Issues Writing Consortium: Teaching Tips was contributed by Valerie Lopes, PhD, Professor, Centre for Academic Excellence, Seneca College, Canada.

————————————————————————————————————–

Critical Thinking:

A well-cultivated critical thinker:

  1. raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely;
  2. gathers and assesses relevant information, and effectively interprets it;
  3. comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards;
  4. thinks open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and
  5. communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems.
  6. Critical thinking is, self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities (Paul & Elder, 2002, p. 15).

Facione (2004) described cognitive skills and affective dispositions associated with critical thinking. These include:

Critical Thinking and the Learning Environment:

a. Formulate discussions and questions to improve adult learners’ critical thinking skills (Paul & Elder, 2006).:

  • Clarity: Could you elaborate further? Could you give me an example?
  • Accuracy: How could we find out if that is true? How could we verify or test that?
  • Precision: Could you give me more details? Could you be more exact?
  • Relevance: How does that relate to the problem? How does that help us with the issue?
  • Depth: What factors make this a difficult problem? What are some of the complexities of this question?
  • Breadth: Do we need to look at this from another perspective? Do we need to consider another point of view?
  • Logic: Does all this make sense together? Does what you say follow from the evidence?
  • Significance: Is this the central idea to focus on? Which of these facts are most important?
  • Fairness: Do I have any vested interest in this issue? Am I sympathetically representing the viewpoints of others?

b. Plan authentic tasks which address important issues or problems.

c. Replicate real life situations within the discipline.

d. Restructure learning to promote higher level thinking (See “Blooms taxonomy”).

e. Promote active learning by planning inductive teaching- learning methods such as:

  • Guided Inquiry;
  • Problem-based;
  • Project-based; and
  • Case-base learning.

Resources: Svinicki & McKeachie, 2011; Huba & Freed, 2000; Paul & Elder, 2006; Prince & Felder, 2006.

Submitted by

Valerie Lopes, PhD

Seneca College, Canada

Professor, Centre for Academic Excellence

Considering mentoring an undergraduate researcher this semester?

“…undergraduate research opportunities [in STEM fields] help clarify students’ interest in research and encourage students who hadn’t anticipated graduate studies to alter direction toward a Ph.D.” – Russel et al. (2007)

Many faculty, postdoctoral fellows, and graduate students find themselves mentoring an undergraduate researcher at some point in their career.  These research experiences have been shown to have a significant impact on the undergraduate researcher.  Specifically in the STEM fields, undergraduate research experience has been linked to increased understanding of how to conduct a research project, increased confidence in their skills as a researcher, and increased awareness of what graduate school is like (Russell et al. 2007).

Interested in learning about effective methods for mentoring undergraduate researchers in STEM disciplines?  The Kaneb Center for Teaching and Learning is hosting a panel discussion titled “Mentoring Undergraduate Research in STEM Disciplines” on Wednesday January 23, 2013.  For more information (and registration) please visit http://kaneb.nd.edu/events/ All disciplines are welcome.

Russell, S.H., Hancock, M.P., and J. McCullough (2007). Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences. Science Vol.316 No.5824 pp.548-549.

 

As you finalize your first day of class agenda, remember that making “critical connections” (Kreizinger, 2006) is one way to begin creating a positive classroom climate.  This approach focuses on making connections rather than giving directions.  The goals of the first class session are to connect students to the instructor, connect the instructor to the content, and connect course content to the students.  Below are a few ways that Kaneb Center staff have approached making critical connections in their own classes.

We hope you are inspired to create critical connections on your first day as well!

Kreizinger, J.  (2006).  Critical connections for the first day of class.  Teaching Professor, 20(5), 1.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

“I like having YouTube clips that touch on course themes, a quick visual to bring the content to life for the students, and then spark a brief discussion about what questions the clip raises, and how we will cover those questions throughout the semester. “ —Laura Taylor, Kaneb Center Graduate Associate

“I have students in groups of three or four identify a scene from a TV show or movie that they are familiar with then translate it into Spanish and act it out for the class. This is relevant to the class since the students will be acting in their video production later in the semester.” —Kevin Barry, Kaneb Center Director

“I ask students in my multimedia class to create an avatar – an image that represents them in some way. They choose one of several online tools that help create a Marvel super hero or a character from South Park (example to the left) or the Simpsons. This activity gives students a feel for the prevalent class format, shows me how quickly they learn a new tool, and provides something to talk about when we meet later on. The students are required submit their images online, so they also become oriented to the Sakai assignments tool. Some students even use their avatar as a profile image when setting up online accounts required for the course.”  —Chris Clark, Kaneb Center Assistant Director

“As a way of illustrating the various skills sets that each student will contribute to the semester-long research project, we will complete a skills inventory as part of our first day activities and debrief the results during the second class session.  The debrief session is key for uncovering our collective strengths and areas where there are opportunities for growth.” —Amanda McKendree, Kaneb Center Assistant Director

How will you initiate critical connections on your first day of class?

The following entry from the 2012-2013 Teaching Issues Writing Consortium: Teaching Tips was contributed by Rebecca Clemente, Director for the Center of Teaching and Learning, North Central College, Naperville, Illinois.

———————————————————————–

For some classes it may be important to obtain information about what assignments and experiences were of value before course evaluations are returned – especially if you are preparing to teach the same course the next term prior to course evaluations being processed and returned.

1. Prepare a sheet of paper that simply has a label for the assignment or experience on the top – one for each area you are interested in obtaining information.  Example labels could be:

  • Autobiography of your science education
  • Article critique
  • Field experience
  • Small group discussions on differentiation
  • Long-term observation journal

2. Group your students by the number of areas you are exploring.

3. Give each group one of the sheets ask one person to be the scribe.  They are to write what was effective about the assignment/experience and what was ineffective about the assignment.  Give the group about three minutes to do this.

4. Rotate sheets clockwise.  The next group reads what is on the sheet and adds effective and ineffective aspects.  Give the group about three minutes to do this.

5. Rotate sheets clockwise again…same task as above.  Give the group about three minutes to do this.

6. Rotate sheets clockwise – this is the last time – the group is to read all the comments and then rank order the three most important comments on the sheet.  The groups may need more than three minutes but are usually done within five minutes.

7. Open the floor for discussion.  Start with the area you are most interested in and ask the group that has that sheet to talk about their ranking and why they rated things this way.  This allows you to hear, respond, and acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses.  Because the group that ranks speaks first there is less resistance to engaging in the conversation since they are just reporting out the ranking and were not responsible for the items on the sheet.  What I have found is that this acts as a catalyst for a healthy whole class discussion of what was learned during the course.

In addition to providing you with guidance for the next time you teach the course, you will be able to reemphasize course outcomes, rearticulate interconnections of concepts and experiences, and communicate intent while having a chance to review material.  Collect the sheets so that you can read everything and use them to shape aspects of the course the next time you teach it.

Rebecca Clemente, Director for the Center of Teaching and Learning

North Central College

Naperville, Illinois

http://northcentralcollege.edu

Nutrition and Learning

The following entry from the 2012-2013 Teaching Issues Writing Consortium: Teaching Tips was contributed by Molly H. Baker, Ph.D., Director of Instructional Technology, Sauk Valley Community College.

———————————————————————–

Let’s consider a major factor that affects students’ attention and engagement, especially in an evening or other extended length class. Of course, overall nutrition affects the brain also, things like enough iron, vitamins, calcium, and fiber. But here we are going to discuss how what and when your students eat the day of class can make a major difference in their ability to stay awake, focused and able to learn for several hours at the end of the day. Most students don’t know this!

Brains need proteins, carbohydrates and fats to produce energy that can be draw upon while learning. However, not any type of protein, carb or fat will do. Some of these actually make a person drowsy or prevent the right kind of proteins, carbs and fats from doing their job!   Consider these facts and then read more about it at http://www.askdrsears.com/HTML/4/T040400.ASP

  1. Students who arrive hungry, in general, are likely to be irritable, restless, apathetic, sad, unmotivated, and less able to recall earlier learning or apply new learning to problem-solving tasks. Hunger contributes to mental fatigue, as discussed in Day Three. This goes for skipping breakfast before an extended morning class, as well.
  2. Eating habits such as eating a large meal before class or eating a high-carbohydrate/low protein meal may solve the hunger problem, but makes your students drowsy and lethargic. Chocolate, pastries, bean burritos, sunflower seeds, bananas, dairy products, spaghetti with heavy sauce, and fattier meats tend to relax the brain and are ideal in the evening if you are trying to wind down!
  3. Omega-3 fatty acids are important to general brain health. Foods such as eggs, flax or canola oil, salmon or tuna, soybeans, walnuts or pumpkin seeds, wheat germ, and almonds are excellent sources of these healthy fats.
  4. Best foods for pre-class eating before an evening class include:
    1. A lower-calorie, light meal, such as a salad with tuna, vegetables, and dressing made with canola oil, stir-fried vegetables on brown rice, or even yogurt and fresh fruit.
    2. A more filling, but nutritious meal such as a PB&J sandwich on whole grain bread and an apple and glass of milk.
    3. Complex carbohydrates such as fruits like apples or oranges (not fruit juice), whole grain cereals (e.g., oatmeal) or whole-grains (not wheat, but whole wheat, brown rice), and as little refined sugar as possible (e.g, colas, candy, pastries).
    4. Proteins containing tyrosine amino acids, such as seafood, turkey, tofu, lentils, peanuts (or peanut butter), tuna, salmon. These proteins wake up the brain, rather than relax and wind it down.
    5. When eating both energy-producing proteins and carbs, eat the protein BEFORE the complex carbohydrates.
    6. Avoid nicotine, artificial sweeteners, hydrogenated fats in prepared foods, alcohol, junk sugars and white bread before class.

 

Submitted by

Molly H. Baker, Ph.D.

Director, Instructional Technology

Sauk Valley Community College

90% of college students report moderate to high levels of anxiety around public speaking.  As teachers and researchers, we frequently find ourselves in public speaking situations.  Here are a few tips to help with public speaking anxiety:

  1. Plan and practice your movement for during your talk
  2. Don’t begin until you’re ready
  3. Practice concepts, not words
  4. Exercise before your talk
  5. Do deep breathing exercises
  6. Warm up your voice
  7. Drop your hands when you aren’t gesturing
  8. Acknowledge your anxiety and address any unrealistic fears
  9. Have a gimmick in each part of your talk
  10. Mingle before your talk to increase your comfort level
  11. If maintaining eye contact makes you nervous, look at the audiences ears instead.

Attention Graduate and Post Doctoral Students: The Kaneb Center will be hosting a worksop titled “Communicating in the Classroom: Tips for TAs” on Thursday November 8th from 9:30-10:45am in the ND room of LaForutune.  This workshop will focus on an introduction to public speaking and teaching techniques that will enhance classroom communication.  While geared towards communication in the classroom, the tips can be translated to all public speaking situations. To register visit http://kaneb.nd.edu/events/

The following entry from the 2012-2013 Teaching Issues Writing Consortium: Teaching Tips was contributed by Claudia J. Stanny, Ph.D., Director of the Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, University of West Florida.

———————————————————–

Classroom demonstrations that illustrate an important process, phenomenon, or application of a concept can generate interest and engage students with course material.  Although students enjoy classroom demonstrations, they sometimes remember the activity but do not remember the course learning goals that instructors want to promote when they design the demonstration.  An effective demonstration connects student memories of the classroom experience with the concepts the activity was designed to demonstrate.

Strategies that transform an entertaining demonstration into an effective learning experience

  • Identify the learning outcome(s) you intend to promote with the classroom demonstration.  For example, a demonstration that illustrates a counterintuitive or surprising outcome can be used to identify assumptions that lead students to make erroneous predictions.  Students experience surprise at unexpected results, which motivates curiosity and encourages students to give weight and credibility to disciplinary concepts and models that explain these findings.
  • Practice the demonstration to ensure it works properly during class.
  • Prepare students for the demonstration.  Observations are biased by preconceptions (Bransford & Johnson, 1972).  Two observers of the same event will remember it differently if they experience the event with different frameworks and expectations (Holst & Pezdek, 1992).  Don’t assume students will notice the details you notice or interpret the demonstration in the same way you do.  Begin with an explanation that gives students the framework they need to focus their attention on the most relevant aspects of the demonstration.  Remind students about the relation between observations during the demonstration and the course material.
  • If possible, make students predict the outcome before you conduct the demonstration.
  • After the demonstration is finished, ask students to discuss the outcome and their observations with each other and the class as a whole.
  • Reinforce the purpose of the demonstration with a debriefing discussion that identifies and explains the principles demonstrated.  Explicitly connect the observations from the demonstration to course content and the learning goals for the activity.  Use the curiosity elicited by a surprising outcome to focus attention on disciplinary explanations that are based on valid disciplinary assumptions and models rather than the naïve models students used when they made their initial prediction.
  • Ask students to take a minute or two to write a reflection on the demonstration.  What did they learn from this experience?  What was the purpose of including this activity in the class?  Reflective writing will reinforce student learning.  These essays will also reveal areas that continue to confuse students, which instructors can use to refine the demonstration for use in future classes.

 

Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K.  (1972).  Contextual prerequisites for understanding:  Some investigations of comprehension and recall.  Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.

Holst, V. F., & Pezdek, K.  (1992).  Scripts for typical crimes and their effects on memory for eyewitness testimony.  Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 573-587.

Pyper, B. A. (2008).  Best practices in physics demonstrations or “Oh, I thought this was just for entertainment.”  Power Point slides for a presentation at the AAPT UT/ID section meeting, Boise, ID. Retrieved August 2, 2011:  http://emp.byui.edu/PyperB/Best%20Practices%20in%20Physics%20Demonstrations.pdf

 

Submitted by:

Claudia J. Stanny, Ph.D., Director

Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment

University of West Florida

http://uwf.edu/cutla/

 

Believe it or not the Fall 2012 semester is already half over and now is the time to administer early semester evaluations.  Whether you’re a faculty member, instructor of record, or teaching assistant, conducting early semester evaluations can help you in a myriad of ways!  For example conducting, analyzing and discussing early semester evaluations may:

  1. Increase student motivation by demonstrating concern for student learning,
  2. Improve teaching abilities through ongoing formative assessment, and
  3. Improve student achievement by addressing student concerns.

These three outcomes may take years to achieve through constant evaluation, analysis and personal assessment but are well worth it.  

For our younger faculty, postdoctoral and graduate students there is another crucial reason to conduct early semester reviews: 

EVIDENCE!

Evidence of teaching and student learning is critical to the academic process (whether it be performance reviews or job applications).  Early semester evaluations demonstrate your commitment to increasing student motivation and achievement and improving your teaching skills during the semester (as compared to end of the semester evaluations).  It can be beneficial to keep all evaluations together in a Teaching Portfolio.  By analyzing your evaluations from multiple years, you can demonstrate improvement in teaching skill and student performance on a longer time scale highlighting your dedication to the craft.  When all is said and done there is no downside to conducting an early semester review – evidence of improvement, dedication and great teaching can go a long way.

~*- – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -*~

Interested in learning more about early semester evaluations?

 The Kaneb Center for Teaching and Learning has examples of evaluations and many other teaching and learning topics on their website under the resources tab (http://kaneb.nd.edu/rsrcs/).  

 Interested in learning more about teaching portfolios and teaching / learning evidence? 

There are still a few spots open to this semester’s “Teaching Portfolio Design” series.  See the website for more details and registration.

The following entry from the 2012-2013 Teaching Issues Writing Consortium: Teaching Tips was contributed by Patrick Lee Lucas, Ph.D. from the Faculty Teaching & Learning Commons at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

———————————————————–

“It usually takes more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech.”

–Mark Twain

Community engagement, gaining ascendancy in recent years for some disciplines, brings great promise for students and teachers as a memorable and meaningful approach to education.  A burgeoning literature characterizes many aspects of this pedagogy, but a number of clear principles help ensure a quality community-based learning experience for all participants.

validity of the “text”

By thinking of the community as a text, specifically selected for maximum impact in the classroom – as well as beyond it, selection of a community site or partner parallels the agonizing selection of a textbook.  With no “perfect” text out there, teachers must choose a location or organization for students that will help them test out the theories they learn in the classroom, balancing the shortcomings and the positive attributes of the source.  Instructors should consider the difficulty of the community agency as text, how easily it can be read and understood by students, and how poised for highlighting, underlining, and notetaking the agency and its staff, volunteers, and clients might be.

reciprocity

From the perspective of the faculty, one way to guarantee a successful collaboration with students and community partners is to consider the reciprocity of such an undertaking for all parties concerned.  Community engaged activity thus represents not just a one way street, with students and faculty dropping into the community, with little care or concern about the true needs, the success of some approaches over others, and the ability to hear and understand what happens when the vital energy of students finds its way into the city.  There can be nothing more deeply satisfying than for a student to know the tasks they have undertaken really do matter and do make a difference for others.  Having that good feeling in the end requires much listening, an openness to others, and a deep connection to the community by the faculty member.

in it for the long term

By living in a place, one begins to know it more deeply and thus comprehend the needs of its constituents, organizations, and community as a whole.  Community-based work calls for faculty to leave their offices, classrooms, and studios, and be in the city – on its streets, patronizing its retail establishments and services, letting its culture seep in to the faculty life.  By listening closely and examining where the community does not quite come together or where there might be friction or where there exists a need to be met – these cracks and fissures provide golden opportunities for faculty, students, and institutions to truly be of benefit to the places in which they sit.  A long-term attitude of a faculty member thinking with the community ideally makes possible a recognition of an authentic approach that will result in transformative, positive change.

the syllabus and learning goals

Because any community-engaged project requires thoughtful articulation of responsibilities and connection to the educational purposes of activities, the syllabus provides the place for the critically important documentation of expectations for faculty, student, and partner.  Taking the time to work with the community site or agency to help them see the learning goals of the course and the way that the community project ties in with the rest of the material from class makes a huge difference in understanding with the staff, volunteer, or agency with whom or where the student and faculty may work.  In having these conversations before the semester commences and in talking them through, faculty help avoid challenges and circumstances for students, the faculty member themselves, and the community partner throughout the semester and beyond.

resource

Hatcher, Julie A. and Bob Bringle, eds. (2011) Understanding Service Learning and Community Engagement: Crossing Boundaries through Research.  International Association for Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement.

 

Submitted by

Patrick Lee Lucas

Associate Professor

Faculty Teaching & Learning Commons

University of North Carolina at Greensboro

The following entry from the 2012-2013 Teaching Issues Writing Consortium: Teaching Tips was contributed by Julie Frese, Ph.D. at the University of the Rockies.

———————————————————–

According to Dempsey & Sales (1993), the motivational approach to feedback is based on the belief that “…letting people know how well they are performing a task acts as an incentive for greater effort in the future” (p. 4). Creemers (1996) cited the use of feedback and corrective instruction as one of the instructor behaviors that contribute to better student outcomes.

Learners tend to fall on a goal continuum that ranges from ego-involved (performance orientation) to task-involved (learning orientation). If they are ego-involved, they have strong incentives to demonstrate and display their abilities. If learners are task-involved, they possess strong incentives to learn, gain skills, and improve mastery. If a learner receives no cues or feedback to select or favor one goal orientation over another, they act according to their predispositions (Dempsey & Sales, 1993; Hattie and Timperley, 2007).

Cartoon by David Sipress

Typically, instructor feedback has been viewed as a useful technique to assist learners. For example, learner thought patterns and/or actions can be redirected and areas of strength or weakness can be communicated. According to Hoska (1993), it is possible to provide feedback to learners that can influence their goal orientations and maximize their incentive to perform. Approaches that have been successful include: modifying the learner’s view of intelligence, altering the goal structure of the learning task, and controlling the delivery of learning rewards. Hoska (1993) also believes feedback should help learners understand that abilities are skills that can be developed through practice, effort is key to increasing one’s skills, and mistakes are not failures; rather they are part of the skill-development process.

In order to provide effective feedback, the facilitator needs to reflect upon his/her approach to the teaching-learning process. For example, does the instructor view learning from a constructivist perspective or approach it in a more traditionalist fashion? If constructivist teaching practices are used, the emphasis is on helping learners internalize and reshape, or transform new information. This transformation occurs through the creation of new understandings (Jackson, 1986; Gardner, 1991). New cognitive structures can emerge from these understandings. In contrast, the traditional approach has been deemed to be more of a process where the learning process involves repeating or miming new material or information (Jackson, 1986). These two different approaches to learning will determine the instructional strategies used by the instructor, and in turn will impact the level of learner motivation. Feedback can also be organized around different types of interaction: learner-to-learner, learner-to-instructor, learner-to-content, and learner-to-interface (Hillman, Willis, & Gunawardena, 1994).

White and Weight (2000) discuss the issue of the online student who needs extra motivation, and propose various strategies that the instructor/facilitator can use to provide this motivation. These range from sending a direct note to the student to asking all students to relate their learning to their current work experience. The authors also stress the importance of the sensitive nature of these actions. In addition, they believe “Feedback that is timely is far more motivational and beneficial to performance improvement than delayed feedback. Thus, online feedback is best when it is prompt” (p. 63).

Formative feedback potentially “modifies a student’s thinking or behavior for the purpose of learning, and summative feedback assesses how well a student accomplishes a task or achieves a result for the purpose of grading” (White & Weight, 2000, p. 168). Since formative feedback influences thought and behavior, it is more motivational. During this process students are asked to continue doing what they have been doing, ask questions, participate, stay on topic, and/or modify their thinking or approach (when and if necessary). White & Weight (2000) also stress that feedback should be multidimensional, non-evaluative, supportive, student controlled, consistent, constructive, objective, timely, and specific. They cite some of the best practices used by online instructors for providing constructive formative and summative feedback:

  • Focus on specific behavior rather than on the online student
  • Take the needs of the online student into account
  • Direct feedback toward behavior the online student can change
  • Help online students to “own” the feedback
  • Give timely online feedback
  • Check online feedback for clarity
  • Consider online feedback as part of an ongoing relationship (White & Weight, 2000, p. 173-4).

As we strive to provide constructive and substantive formative and summative feedback, it is essential to understand its impact on learner motivation. This knowledge will allow us to utilize more effective instructional practices and provide more meaningful learning experiences, while also improving our course design.

References

Creemers, B. (1996). The school effectiveness knowledge base. In Bollen, R., Creemers, B., Hopkins, D, Lagerweij, N., Reynolds, D., and Stoll, L. Making good schools: Linking school effectiveness and improvement. London: Routledge.

Dempsey, J.V. & Sales, G.C. (1993). Interactive instruction and feedback. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77(1). 81-112. London: Sage Publications. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487

Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D .J.  & C.N. Gunawardena (1994). Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education. 8(2), 30-42.

Hoska, D.M. (1993). Motivating learners through CBI feedback: Developing a positive learner perspective. In Dempsey, J.V. & Sales, G.C. (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 105-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Jackson, P.W. (1986). The practice of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

Sales, G.C. & Johnston, M.D. (1988). Graphic fidelity, gender, and performance in computer-based simulations. (Research Bulletin #1, Improving the Use of Technology in Schools: What We Are Learning). Minneapolis, MN: MECC/UM Center for the Study of Educational Technology.

White, K. W. & Weight, B. H. (2000). The online teaching guide: A handbook of attitudes, strategies and techniques for the virtual classroom. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Submitted by Julie Frese, Ph.D.

University of the Rockies

Julie.Frese@faculty.rockies.edu

http://rockies.edu

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Copyright © 2010 | Kaneb Center for Teaching & Learning | kaneb@nd.edu | 574-631-9146