Below is my process of using the DIVE model for reflecting on a critical incident I encountered here in Costa Rica.
Describe: I was sitting in the living room with my host parents, my host sister Camille (another student visiting from France), and myself, and we were talking with my host mom about her 25 years of hosting students. She started to explain that her husband didn’t go to college and so his job “doesn’t pay well,” and that to supplement their income they started taking in host students. She explained how this allows them to also travel more, as when a student wants to visit a city within the country they offer to drive and find accommodations, and then the students help them with gas money and it ends up being much more affordable.
Interpret: At first, I was a bit taken aback by my host mom’s bluntness in describing the situation, as my host dad was sitting in the room with us in the conversation when she said very straightforwardly that his job doesn’t pay enough for them to uphold a certain lifestyle level. My initial assumption was that this was a bit rude and also embarrassing to (a) talk about private financial matters with people who—although familiar—are guests and not family members or close friends, and to (b) so blatantly say that the breadwinner’s job is inadequate for the family in front of them.
However, looking back, later in the conversation my host dad also joined in to describe how they traveled with students, and it didn’t seem like he was phased by my host mom’s description. So, it could be possible that in Costa Rica people are generally more open about their finances and financial situations than in the US, or just in general talk more openly about personal matters.
Verify: I didn’t have the chance to discuss this specific incident with my host mom or another Costa Rican friend, but by talking with other students in my SLA cohort and through my own observation it seems that, in general, we’ve found that people have more openly shared and discussed stories about personal matters, family events and/or finances than what I would consider to be a normal level of confidence between acquaintances or new friends.
Evaluation: Upon reflection, I’ve realized that although I have grown in my ability to step outside of my cultural assumptions to help me process events and interactions in my host culture, my instinctual, initial gut reactions to events are still very much based in the US culture I’m used to. I also realized that my host mom likely meant no offense to her husband, and simply wanted to share with us more details about why and how much they appreciate their host students.
After reflecting on this particular critical incident, I feel I am better equipped to identify situations when perhaps my cultural assumptions may cause a compulsory instantaneous reaction of uncomfortableness or unease; especially in instances of oversharing or overstepping my culture’s normal boundaries in physical space or in conversation topics. Now that I’ve recognized this about myself, I can be more aware in observing my host culture’s natural boundaries so that I can know when I am simply experiencing a cultural difference or when my own personal boundaries of space and topic are being overstepped, not just the boundaries I may be accustomed to in social settings.