The โ€œSinfulโ€ Soldiers of the Early Ottoman Military Structure: ฮฟฮน แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฯ‰ฮปฯŒฮน

This short research blog focuses on the development of the word แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ โ€œto sinโ€ from the advent of Christianity to the late Byzantine era. The word, แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰, is widely used in the Bible as it appears forty-three times. To wordโ€™s primary meaning in the Bible was to โ€œerr and sinโ€; however, from time to time, it was also used to signify the action of offending. แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ occurs in many different forms in the New Testament as we see it in aorist first-person singular active form แผญฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฟฮฝโ€ eight times, second-person singular indicative middle six times, and second-person indicative active plural form three times.[1] I will trace the different nuances in the meaning of this word in the subsequent periods, especially in the late Byzantine period. My argument is that as several Greek and non-Greek sources indicate, the word แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ began having a military connotation in this period as it was applied to the Christian military units who had cooperated with the enemy forces, especially the Turks.

Inscription, in The Collection of Ancient Greek Inscriptions in the British Museum

        In Homeric times, แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ had no religious connotation. The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament suggests that, initially, the word was used to convey the action of โ€œmissingโ€ i.e failure to follow rules and signify a moral deficit or immoral physical undertaking. [2] However, in the later periods (c. 400 BCE), we begin seeing a shift from legal to religious use since แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ made its way to the Book of Kings in the old testament, meaning โ€œto rebelโ€ against the god and his order in the earth.[3] From a theological standpoint, rebelling against the will of God means to err from the true path and therefore to sin. In this way, those who had intentionally deviated from moral or religious standards came to be defined as ฮฑฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฯ‰ฮปฯŒฯ‚ โ€œthe sinful oneโ€ in the later Christian religious texts.[4]

Early Christian symbols on an Egyptian textile, the Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio.

        แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ is mostly used to signify the action of โ€œsinโ€ and neglecting the commands of God with an exception of โ€œoffendingโ€ in the New Testament.[5] In the Book of Romans, for instance, we see the following structure: โ€œฮณแฝฐฯ แผ€ฮฝฯŒฮผฯ‰ฯ‚ แผฅฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฟฮฝ แผ€ฮฝฯŒฮผฯ‰ฯ‚ ฮบฮฑแฝถโ€ which means โ€œIndeed without law I sinned without law also[โ€ฆ]โ€.[6] Here, แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ was used in the aorist, active, and indicative form. In another example, this time from the Book of Corinthians, the word is used in such a construction: โ€œฮฟแฝ•ฯ„ฯ‰ฯ‚ ฮดแฝฒ แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฮฟฮฝฯ„ฮตฯ‚ ฮตแผฐฯ‚ ฯ„ฮฟแฝบฯ‚โ€ meaning โ€œthus moreover sinning against those [โ€ฆ]โ€ in the participle, present, active form.[7] Besides the action of sinning, แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ seems to be used in a different meaning, โ€œto offendโ€, in the Book of Apostles although a minor disagreement exists between various interpreters. Regarding the following phase: โ€œฮšฮฑฮฏฯƒฮฑฯฮฌ ฯ„ฮน แผฅฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฟฮฝ[โ€ฆ]โ€ while New American Standard Bible renders the word as โ€œcommittingโ€, the King James version translate the term as โ€œoffendingโ€. However, the new international version disagrees with these suggestions, interpreting the whole phrase as โ€œCaesar [in] anything sinned [โ€ฆ]โ€.[8]

Nicolle, David. Armies of the Ottoman Turks 1300-1774. London: Osprey, 1983.

        Besides its use in legal and religious spheres, towards the late Byzantine period, we begin seeing the word, แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰, or its variants in Greek and Turkish texts in the military context. With the Turkish advance towards western Asia Minor and the Balkans in the later 13th and early 14th centuries, the local Greek-speaking people began adjusting to the newly established political reality in their respective territories by means of cooperating with their new rulers. A significant portion of the Greek population in these regions had converted to Islam, while others participated in the Ottoman military system as auxiliary units. As the later Byzantine writer Pachymeres states in his ฮ™ฯƒฯ„ฮฟฯฮฏฮฑ, the Greeks from Anatolia, โ€œแผฯ€ฮนฮผฮนฮพฮฌฮฝฯ„ฯ‰ฮฝ ฮบฮฑแฝถ แฟฌฯ‰ฮผฮฑรญฯ‰ฮฝ แผฮพ แผ€ฮฝฮฑฯ„ฮฟฮปแฟ†ฯ‚โ€, had occasionally joined the Turkish forces to raid the Byzantine territories in the hopes of acquiring material gain.[9] Besides Pachymeres, Doukas also refers to these Greek collaborators in his historical work, calling them โ€œฮผฮนฮพฮฟฮฒฮฑฯฮฒฮฑฯฮฟฮนโ€ meaning half-Greek and half-Turks.[10] Although these authors shunned using the word, แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฯ‰ฮปฯŒฯ‚, several Turkish authors borrow this term from their Greek correspondents. An early Ottoman called AลŸฤฑkpaลŸazade reports that the founder of the Ottoman principality, Osman Gazi, had a โ€œmartolosโ€ ( ู…ุงุฑุชู„ูˆุณ) by the name of Artun who acted as a spy in the Byzantine territories for the Ottomans.[11] After the Ottoman conquests in the Balkans, as the land surveys indicate, the Ottomans had given landed estates to several Christian military units who were also called โ€œmartolosโ€.[12]

Greek Armatolos by Carl Haag (1820โ€“1915).

         Lastly, after the mid-fourteenth century, the Ottomans also formed provincial forces in mainland Greece named โ€œarmatolosโ€ which had a clear phonetic resemblance with the word โ€œamartolosโ€. Although several scholars argued that this term had derived from a medieval loan word from Latin arma โ€œweaponโ€ via Greek ฮฑฯฮผฮฑฯ„ฮฟฮปฯŒฯ‚ it is also within the boundaries of possibility that the development of that word might have originated from ฮฑฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฯ‰ฮปฯŒฯ‚ since the use of the latter preceded the former. During the Greek War of Independence (1821-1828), these ฮฑฯฮผฮฑฯ„ฮฟฮปฯŒฯ‚ units had actively participated in military encounters against the Ottoman forces as we are able to trace their role in Greek folk songs: โ€œฯƒฯ…ฮปฮปฮฟฮณฮนฯƒฯ„ฮตฮฏฯ„ฮต ฯ„ฮฟ ฮบฮฑฮปฮฌ, /ฯŒฯ„ฮน (: ฮณฮนฮฑฯ„ฮฏ) ฯƒฮฑฯ‚ ฮบฮฑฮฏฮผฮต ฯ„ฮฑ ฯ‡ฯ‰ฯฮนฮฌยท / ฮณฯฮฎฮณฮฟฯฮฑ ฯ„โ€™ ฮฑฯฮผฮฑฯ„ฮฟฮปฮฏฮบฮน,/ ฮฟฯ„โ€™ ฮตฯฯ‡ฯŒฮผฮฑฯƒฯ„ฮต ฯƒฮฑฮฝ ฮปฯฮบฮฟฮนโ€ โ€œThink well, / that [why] we burn your villages; / quickly the armatoliki, / that we come like wolvesโ€.[13]

        In sum, แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰ had no religious implications during Homeric times as it was used to convey the idea of โ€œmissingโ€ (i.e. โ€œmissing the markโ€). However, in the later periods, it started appearing in the Bible as the word began to signify the act of transgression against the word of God. In the late Byzantine period, however, a derivation of this word,  แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฯ‰ฮปฯŒฯ‚, was used for Christians who cooperated with the enemy forces since it was thought that they rebelled against God by aligning themselves with the non-Christian adversaries. 


[1] Thesaurus Linguae Graecae. Search for word: แผฮผฮฑฯฯ„ฮฌฮฝฯ‰.

[2]Danker, Frederick W. et al., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Exeter: Eerdmans, 1974) 44.

[3] Ibid. 43.

[4] Oxford Classical Greek Dictionary, ed. James Morwood and John Taylor, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)

[5] Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Exeter: William Eerdmen Publishing, 1985. 49.

[6] www.biblegateway.com, Romans 2:12-16.

[7] www.biblegateway.com, Corinthians 8-12.

[8] www.biblegateway.com, Acts 25:8.

[9] George Pachymeres, Relations Historiques, ed. Albert Failler, 5 vols (Paris, 1984โ€“2000) 4:643.18.

[10] Doukas, Decline and Fall of Byzantium to the Ottoman Turks by Doukas, ed. Harry Magouilas. Detroit, 1975. 33.

[11] AลŸฤฑkpaลŸazade, OsmanoฤŸullarฤฑโ€™nฤฑn Tarihi ed. Kemal Yavuz and Yekta Saraรง. ฤฐstanbul: MAS Matbaacฤฑlฤฑk, 2003. 324.

[12] Suret-i Defter-i Sancak-ฤฑ Tirhala, ed. Melek Delilbasi and Muzaffer Arikan, (Ankara: TTK, 2001) 296-334.

[13] Demetrius Petropoulos, ฮตฮปฮปฮทฮฝฮนฮบฮฑ ฮดฮทฮผฮฟฯ„ฮนฮบฮฑ ฯ„ฯฮฑฮณฮฟฯ…ฮดฮนฮฑ Vol1 (Greek Popular Songs), (Athens: ฮ’ฮฑฯƒฮนฮบฮท ฮฒฮนฮฒฮปฮนฮฟฮธฮทฮบฮท, 1958): 3-65.

โ€œTo Hell or Heaven with the Greeksโ€: Common Apocalyptic Beliefs Between the Turks and the Greeks in the Late Middle Ages

        The expansion of the Oghuz Turks towards the Levant region in the early to mid- 11th century had crucial importance not only for the Middle eastern region but also world politics. The expansion of the Turkish political dominance in the region culminated in the Battle of Manzikert in 1071 which paved the way for various Turkish-speaking groups to migrate to Anatolia in the hopes of finding a new financial resource for their nomadic economic structure. The Turks conquereed to the region by the force of arms; however, as time passed, they began to adapt to the cultural, ecologic, politic and socio-economic realities of their new homelands. Their close interactions with the neighboring communities not only reshaped their physical appearances, economic structures, administrative and bureaucratic practices but also introduced them to new spiritual and religious beliefs. Contemporary scholarship in the area of interfaith and several cross-cultural studies have recently demonstrated how the Turks actually borrowed eschatological ideas and notions with respect to the end of the world and the developments that are expected to take place prior to this cataclysmic event.  

        Although interfaith and cultural exchange began taking place between the Greeks and Turks immediately after 1071 (and perhaps even before then), I would argue these interactions noticeably increased alongside the Turkish political expansion towards western Anatolia and Thrace especially after the late 1200s and early 1300s. The missionary activities of Turkish holy men and the tolerant attitudes of the state officials in these Turkish-controlled regions created an environment for Christians and Muslims to discuss various spiritual matters and learn more about each otherโ€™s faiths. In fact, one of the most influential Orthodox clerics, Gregory Palamas, was invited by the Ottoman court to converse about religion with a Muslim spiritual figure in the 1340s. Referring to several striking similarities between the Jesus Prayer and Dhikr practice, some scholars even argue that the influence of Islamic Sufi ideology encourages the appearance of Hesychasm in the Byzantine spiritual environment in this period.[1] Besides the Islamic ideological influence over Orthodox Christianity, it seems that some Christian beliefs also disseminated among the Muslim believers.

Christ as the apocalyptic Lamb with the cross on the throne surrounded with seven candlesticks. Chancel mosaic, 6th century CE.

        A certain Ottoman Sufi by the name of Ahmed Bican who lived in fifteenth century Gallipoli seems to have possessed an extensive knowledge about the Byzantine apocalyptic traditions. In his book, Dรผrr-i Meknรปn, not only he did refer to several Byzantine messianic beliefs, but he also refashioned them with an Islamized veneer. For example, although there is no certain date regarding the end of the world in the theology, adopting the Byzantine tradition, adopted the opinion that doomsday will take place in 1492. What is even more noteworthy is his familiarity with the Byzantine liturgical calendar. It seems that he was personally aware of the Byzantine system since he states that Byzantine scholars determined the era of humankind as 7000 years; however, since Muslims use a lunar calendar instead of solar calendar, he notes that it should be regarded as 7200 years by the Muslims. 

        Furthermore, a general belief about the blonde people in Byzantine apocalyptic and messianic expectations can be observed in Bicanโ€™s work too. According to these, the Byzantine peoples believed that their capital, the city of Constantinople, will fall to their enemies one day; however, a blonde nation from the northern regions will soon appear to help the Greeks to โ€˜liberateโ€™ their previous possession, expelling the Muslims as far as Syria. In his work, Bican also stated that one of the โ€œblonde peoplesโ€ from the northern regions will indeed recapture Constantinople and expel the Muslims soon but he also made some additions to the story. Attributing a messianic role to the Ottoman ruler, he argued that the sultan will appear in this desperate situation and be able to defeat the blonde people by recapturing Constantinople for the second time, glorifying the religion of Islam.

Georgios Klontzas, “The Last Judgement” (1540-1608).

         Yet lastly, Bican seems to have been aware of a Greek messianic tradition prophesizing โ€œthe return of the kingโ€ which promises a rightful ruler will reclaim the throne of Constantinople.  The Laskaris dynasty which came to power in Nicaea after 1204 had a special importance for western Anatolians since Laskarid rulers initiated an economic development program in the region and successfully protected the eastern borders against the Turcoman incursions in this period. When Michael Palaeologus usurped the Byzantine throne in 1261 by imprisoning and then blinding John, the last Laskarid ruler of the empire, the western Anatolian Byzantines began developing stories, predicting his expected return. Cyril Mango argues this belief even spread to the European half of the empire since a prophecy which was circulated in the 13th century tells about a civil war that would take place in Constantinople. According to this prophecy, he argues, at the end of the civil war, as an old and shabbily dressed man, John Laskaris would appear in Constantinople to be crowned by the angels. His shabbily dress and his old age refers to the imprisonment case and signals that a civil war will take place in his later years. After the enthronement, the angels will give him a sword, saying; โ€œTake courage, John, vanquish the enemy!โ€

Depiction of a Deviant Dervish from the Early Ottoman Period (Abdal-i Rum), in The Nauigations, Peregrinations, and Voyages, Made into Turkie by Nicholas Nicholay Daulphinois, trans. T. Washington the Younger, 103r.

        In Bicanโ€™s work, I think, it is possible to observe several clues about this late Byzantine apocalyptic expectation since Bican also talks about a civil war that would wake place in Constantinople. According to his interpretation, the fighting parties will be led by two military figures who have these initials in their name: โ€œMโ€ and โ€œSโ€. Although, I think, โ€œMโ€ might represent Michael Palaeologus, โ€œSโ€ does not match with Johnโ€™s initial. However, I argue that this letter might be modified in a later period due to Bicanโ€™s concern with adjusting it to a specific contemporary ruler. It is also within the boundaries of possibility that โ€œSโ€ stands for the second and last consonants of the dynastic name of John: Laskaris. Although the events were given in a very fragmented nature in this work, Bican also points out an imprisonment case, saying that the imprisoned will soon take the throne by defeating his enemy which has a clear resemblance with John Laskarisโ€™ imprisonment by Michael.

Depiction of a Heterodox Dervish Figure (Portrait of a Qalandar), Timurid, 9th-15th century. ยฉ Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (Cora Timken Burnett Collection, 57.51.30).

        Messianic and apocalyptical intellectual exchange constitute a small part of interactions between the various groups of Christians and Muslims, who have lived in the Middle East and the Balkans side by side for the centuries. There are many more cultural and religious interactions between these people in this regard including but not limited to spread of brotherhood (futuwwa) institutions from the crusader states to the Muslim world in the Levant region. Although scholars have begun turning their focus to these borrowings in the eastern Mediterranean in the last couple of decades, there are still a long way to traverse since western Anatolia and the Balkans have received less attention so far. Hopefully, as the winds of time are changing, more scholars and students will become curious about the relations, interactions and shared traditions between Christians and Muslims in Istanbul and beyond.

Husamettin Simsir
PhD Candidate in History
University of Notre Dame

Further Reading

Arnakis, G. Georgiades. โ€œGregory Palamas among the Turks and Documents of His Captivity as Historical Sources.โ€ Speculum, Vol. 26, No. 1 (1951): 104-118.

Bican, YazฤฑcฤฑoฤŸlu Ahmed. Dรผrr-i Meknun. Trans. Necdet SakaoฤŸlu. ฤฐstanbul: Tarih Vakfฤฑ Yurt Yayฤฑnlarฤฑ, 1999.

Karamustafa, Ahmet. God’s Unruly Friends. Utah: University of Utah Press, 1994.

Preiser-Kapeller, J. โ€œWebs of conversion. An analysis of social networks of converts across Islamic-Christian borders in Anatolia, South-eastern Europe and the Black Sea from the 13th to the 15th cent.โ€ Workshop Cross-cultural life-worlds, Institute for Byzantine Studies, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Bamberg 2012.

ลžahin, Kaya โ€œConstantinople and the End Time: The Ottoman Conquest as a Portent of the Last Hourโ€ Journal of Early Modern History 14 (2010): 317-354.

Shawcross, Teresa. โ€œIn the Name of the True Emperor: Politics of Resistance after the Palaiologan Usurpationโ€ Byzantinoslavica 66 (2008): 203-229.

Spanos, Apostolos. โ€œImperial Sanctity in Byzantium: The case of the emperor John III Vatatzesโ€ Research Gate 10.13140/RG.2.1.3635.6248.


[1] Nicol defines the prayer practice in the Eastern Christian tradition as follows: โ€œin the solitude of his cell, the monk must sit with chin resting on his breast and eyes fixed upon his navel. Then, while carefully regulating his breathing, he must say over the Jesus-Prayer.โ€ Donald M. Nicol, Church, and Society in the Last Centuries of Byzantium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) 38.

Varangian Guards and Their Traces in Istanbul: Runic Inscriptions in Hagia Sophia

Since its foundation in around 657 BC by the colonists of the city-state of Megara in Greece, the city of Constantinople was inhabited by people from different ethnicities and cultures. One of the most interesting inhabitants of the city could be worded as a group of โ€œnorthernโ€ mercenary soldiers who were later assigned as the personal guards of the Byzantine emperor. Several primary sources from the tenth and the eleventh centuries tell about their military and socio-political activities in the Byzantine empire in general and in Constantinople in particular. Although the Byzantine historians and chronicles regarded them as the โ€œaxe-bearingโ€ barbarians who descended from the freezing regions of the northern countries, they also had an implicitโ€”and sometimes explicitโ€”admiration for these soldiers regarding their โ€œunshakable courageโ€ and โ€œstrong loyaltyโ€ to their patron, the Byzantine emperor.

The earliest records about the presence of the Varangian guards in the Byzantine army date back to the end of the ninth century. In this period, the Kievan Rus tribes, which crossed from Scandinavia to Northern Russia and then poured into the Dnieper region, established their first settlements north of the Black sea. Although they came into conflict with the Byzantines by besieging the city of Constantinople on two separate occasions, as time went by, these northern warriors also built political and merchandise ties with the Byzantines. As a result of growing political relationships, the Byzantines began to import a considerable number of Kievan Rus soldiers who were gradually employed as the personal bodyguards of the emperor.

The Varangian guardsโ€™ functions differed in times of war and in times of peace. It is possible to see in tenth and eleventh century Byzantine sources that these units were often used in campaigns against the Muslim political entities in the east. In a campaign season, since they were the most valuable and important military units in the Byzantine army, they intervened in a battle during the most critical moments. In times of peace, however, they stayed mostly in the capital and at other strategic points, serving as a police force to provide security.

The Varangian guards who were employed in Constantinople as security forces appear to have left their remarks in the city. Today it is possible to encounter the vestiges of their existence in the former Greek Orthodox Christian Patriarchal Cathedral, later an Ottoman imperial mosque and now a museum, Hagia Sophia. In Hagia Sophia, there are two partially readable inscriptions, written in runic form. The first one is called the Halfdan Inscription. Unfortunately, the inscription is so worn down that only a portion of the name can be clearly read. In her article, Elisabeth Svรคrdstrรถm deduced that the readable part โ€œ-ftanโ€ must indicate the Nordic name โ€œHalfdanโ€. She further noted that the remainder of the inscription is illegible, but it probably followed a common formula such as โ€œX carved these runes.โ€

Transcription of the recognizable Halfdan runes.
Transcription of the recognizable Halfdan runes. Public domain.

A second inscription was discovered by Folke Hรถgberg in 1975. An article regarding this new discovery was published by Mats G. Larsson in his article “Nyfunna runor i Hagia Sofia.” According to Larssonโ€™s interpretation, the inscription could be identified as follows: โ€œAri m(ade these runes).” Later, an archeologist from the University of Bergen, Svein Indrelid, announced the discovery of five other Runic inscriptions in Hagia Sophia, although these have not yet been published. She further stated that it is within the boundaries of possibility that there may well have been more inscriptions in Hagia Sophia that await discovery.

Hagia Sofia runic inscription
The “Halfdan inscription,” photographed by Hermann Junghans, 2014.

With the relative weakening of the Byzantine political, economic and military systems throughout the thirteenth century, we encounter the traces of the Varangian guards rarely compared to the previous periods. It is known that the Varangian guards were the main components of the defensive army which was employed by the Byzantines in Constantinople during the siege of 1204. Although it has been argued that the Nicaean emperors, who took refuge in the west of Asian minor after the 1204 catastrophe, tried to raise up a Varangian unit to boast their legitimacy against other rival Greek states such as the Despotate of Epirusโ€”if it genuinely existedโ€”it might have been just a mere ceremonial company since they played no important role in ongoing military encounters. Unfortunately, we know very little about the structure of the royal guard units in the Byzantine Empire after the recovery of the city from the Latins in 1261; however, several scholars including Savvas Kyriakis assert the idea that the some of the Cretan refugees, numbering less than 500, who escaped from Venetian rule and took refuge in Byzantium in the fourteenth century, were employed as royal guards who protected city gates and strategic locations in the capital. Also, there are several reliable reports that these troops were employed in the defense of Constantinople against the Ottomans in 1453. Further, in the late 1300s and the early 1400s, some people still identified themselves as Varangians in the city of Constantinople.

Image of the Hagia Sofia
https://www.hagiasophia.com

In conclusion, the runic inscriptions in Hagia Sophia still stand as witness to the existence of the Varangian Guards in Constantinople. Located on the parapet on the top floor of the southern (the first one) and the northern gallery (the second one), these inscriptions gives their visitors an exclusive opportunity to perceive Istanbulโ€™s unique cosmopolitan and cross-cultural historical heritage.

Husamettin Simsir
Ph.D. Candidate in History
University of Notre Dame